uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 111) Show all publications
Hijazi, Z., Oldgren, J., Lindbäck, J., Alexander, J. H., Connolly, S. J., Eikelboom, J. W., . . . Wallentin, L. (2018). A biomarker-based risk score to predict death in patients with atrial fibrillation: the ABC (age, biomarkers, clinical history) death risk score. European Heart Journal, 39(6), 477-485
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A biomarker-based risk score to predict death in patients with atrial fibrillation: the ABC (age, biomarkers, clinical history) death risk score
Show others...
2018 (English)In: European Heart Journal, ISSN 0195-668X, E-ISSN 1522-9645, Vol. 39, no 6, p. 477-485Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims: In atrial fibrillation (AF), mortality remains high despite effective anticoagulation. A model predicting the risk of death in these patients is currently not available. We developed and validated a risk score for death in anticoagulated patients with AF including both clinical information and biomarkers.

Methods and results: The new risk score was developed and internally validated in 14 611 patients with AF randomized to apixaban vs. warfarin for a median of 1.9 years. External validation was performed in 8548 patients with AF randomized to dabigatran vs. warfarin for 2.0 years. Biomarker samples were obtained at study entry. Variables significantly contributing to the prediction of all-cause mortality were assessed by Cox-regression. Each variable obtained a weight proportional to the model coefficients. There were 1047 all-cause deaths in the derivation and 594 in the validation cohort. The most important predictors of death were N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin-T, growth differentiation factor-15, age, and heart failure, and these were included in the ABC (Age, Biomarkers, Clinical history)-death risk score. The score was well-calibrated and yielded higher c-indices than a model based on all clinical variables in both the derivation (0.74 vs. 0.68) and validation cohorts (0.74 vs. 0.67). The reduction in mortality with apixaban was most pronounced in patients with a high ABC-death score.

Conclusion: A new biomarker-based score for predicting risk of death in anticoagulated AF patients was developed, internally and externally validated, and well-calibrated in two large cohorts. The ABC-death risk score performed well and may contribute to overall risk assessment in AF.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
OXFORD UNIV PRESS, 2018
Keywords
Atrial fibrillation, Biomarkers, Mortality, NOAC, Oral anticoagulation, Risk score
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-348121 (URN)10.1093/eurheartj/ehx584 (DOI)000424876100015 ()29069359 (PubMedID)
Funder
Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research , RB13-0197Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20090183
Available from: 2018-04-11 Created: 2018-04-11 Last updated: 2018-04-11Bibliographically approved
Batra, G., Friberg, L., Erlinge, D., James, S. K., Jernberg, T., Svennblad, B., . . . Oldgren, J. (2018). Antithrombotic therapy after myocardial infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, 4(1), 36-45
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Antithrombotic therapy after myocardial infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Show others...
2018 (English)In: European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, ISSN 2055-6837, E-ISSN 2055-6845, Vol. 4, no 1, p. 36-45Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims: Optimal antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and atrial fibrillation is uncertain. In this study, we compared antithrombotic regimes with regard to a composite cardiovascular outcome of all-cause mortality, MI or ischaemic stroke, and major bleeds.

Methods and results: Patients between October 2005 and December 2012 were identified in Swedish registries, n = 7116. Landmark 0-90 and 91-365 days of outcome were evaluated with Cox-regressions, with dual antiplatelet therapy as reference. At discharge, 16.2% received triple therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin), 1.9% aspirin plus warfarin, 7.3% clopidogrel plus warfarin, and 60.8% dual antiplatelets. For cardiovascular outcome, adjusted hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval (HR) for triple therapy was 0.86 (0.70-1.07) for 0-90 days and 0.78 (0.58-1.05) for 91-365 days. A HR of 2.16 (1.48-3.13) and 1.61 (0.98-2.66) during 0-90 and 91-365 days, respectively, was observed for major bleeds. For aspirin plus warfarin, HR 0.82 (0.54-1.26) and 0.62 (0.48-0.79) was observed for cardiovascular outcome and 1.30 (0.60-2.85) and 1.01 (0.63-1.62) for major bleeds during 0-90 and 91-365 days, respectively. For clopidogrel plus warfarin, HR of 0.90 (0.68-1.19) and 0.68 (0.49-0.95) was observed for cardiovascular outcome and 1.28 (0.71-2.32) and 1.08 (0.57-2.04) for major bleeds during 0-90 and 91-365 days, respectively.

Conclusion: Compared to dual antiplatelets, aspirin or clopidogrel plus warfarin therapy was associated with similar 0-90 days and lower 91-365 days of risk of the cardiovascular outcome, without higher risk of major bleeds. Triple therapy was associated with non-significant lower risk of cardiovascular outcome and higher risk of major bleeds.

National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-320310 (URN)10.1093/ehjcvp/pvx033 (DOI)000419693700010 ()29126156 (PubMedID)
Funder
Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research , KF10-0024
Available from: 2017-04-19 Created: 2017-04-19 Last updated: 2018-02-20Bibliographically approved
Proietti, M., Hijazi, Z., Andersson, U., Connolly, S. J., Eikelboom, J. W., Ezekowitz, M. D., . . . Wallentin, L. (2018). Comparison of bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the RE-LY trial. Journal of Internal Medicine, 283(3), 282-292
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Comparison of bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the RE-LY trial
Show others...
2018 (English)In: Journal of Internal Medicine, ISSN 0954-6820, E-ISSN 1365-2796, Vol. 283, no 3, p. 282-292Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Oral anticoagulation is the mainstay of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), but must be balanced against the associated bleeding risk. Several risk scores have been proposed for prediction of bleeding events in patients with AF.

Objectives: To compare the performance of contemporary clinical bleeding risk scores in 18113 patients with AF randomized to dabigatran 110 mg, 150 mg or warfarin in the RE-LY trial.

Methods: HAS-BLED, ORBIT, ATRIA and HEMORR(2)HAGES bleeding risk scores were calculated based on clinical information at baseline. All major bleeding events were centrally adjudicated.

Results: There were 1182 (6.5%) major bleeding events during a median follow-up of 2.0 years. For all the four schemes, high-risk subgroups had higher risk of major bleeding (all P<0.001). The ORBIT score showed the best discrimination with c-indices of 0.66, 0.66 and 0.62, respectively, for major, life-threatening and intracranial bleeding, which were significantly better than for the HAS-BLED score (difference in c-indices: 0.050, 0.053 and 0.048, respectively, all P<0.05). The ORBIT score also showed the best calibration compared with previous data. Significant treatment interactions between the bleeding scores and the risk of major bleeding with dabigatran 150 mg BD versus warfarin were found for the ORBIT (P=0.0019), ATRIA (P<0.001) and HEMORR(2)HAGES (P<0.001) scores. HAS-BLED score showed a nonsignificant trend for interaction (P=0.0607).

Conclusions: Amongst the current clinical bleeding risk scores, the ORBIT score demonstrated the best discrimination and calibration. All the scores demonstrated, to a variable extent, an interaction with bleeding risk associated with dabigatran or warfarin.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY, 2018
Keywords
anticoagulation treatment, atrial fibrillation, bleeding risk scores, dabigatran, major bleeding
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-347538 (URN)10.1111/joim.12702 (DOI)000425521000005 ()29044861 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2018-04-04 Created: 2018-04-04 Last updated: 2018-04-04Bibliographically approved
Lagedal, R., Elfwén, L., James, S. K., Oldgren, J., Erlinge, D., Östlund, O., . . . Nordberg, P. (2018). Design of DISCO-Direct or Subacute Coronary Angiography in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest study. American Heart Journal, 197, 53-61, Article ID S0002-8703(17)30376-9.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Design of DISCO-Direct or Subacute Coronary Angiography in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest study
Show others...
2018 (English)In: American Heart Journal, ISSN 0002-8703, E-ISSN 1097-6744, Vol. 197, p. 53-61, article id S0002-8703(17)30376-9Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome is a common cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In patients with OHCA presenting with ST elevation, immediate coronary angiography and potential percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after return of spontaneous circulation are recommended. However, the evidence for this invasive strategy in patients without ST elevation is limited. Observational studies have shown a culprit coronary artery occlusion in about 30% of these patients, indicating the electrocardiogram's (ECG's) limited sensitivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether immediate coronary angiography and subsequent PCI will provide outcome benefits in OHCA patients without ST elevation.

METHODS/DESIGN: We describe the design of the DIrect or Subacute Coronary angiography in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study (DISCO)-a pragmatic national, multicenter, randomized, clinical study. OHCA patients presenting with no ST elevation on their first recorded ECG will be randomized to a strategy of immediate coronary angiography or to standard of care with admission to intensive care and angiography after 3days at the earliest unless the patient shows signs of acute ischemia or hemodynamic instability. Primary end point is 30-day survival. An estimated 1,006 patients give 80% power (α = .05) to detect a 20% improved 30-day survival rate from 45% to 54%. Secondary outcomes include good neurologic recovery at 30days and 6months, and cognitive function and cardiac function at 6months.

CONCLUSION: This randomized clinical study will evaluate the effect of immediate coronary angiography after OHCA on 30-day survival in patients without ST elevation on their first recorded ECG.

National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-342766 (URN)10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.009 (DOI)000425723700007 ()29447784 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2018-02-23 Created: 2018-02-23 Last updated: 2018-05-03Bibliographically approved
Cannon, C. P., Lip, G. Y. H. & Oldgren, J. (2018). Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with Dabigatran after PCI in Atrial Fibrillation: The authors reply [Letter to the editor]. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(5), 485-486
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with Dabigatran after PCI in Atrial Fibrillation: The authors reply
2018 (English)In: New England Journal of Medicine, ISSN 0028-4793, E-ISSN 1533-4406, Vol. 378, no 5, p. 485-486Article in journal, Letter (Other academic) Published
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-350196 (URN)10.1056/NEJMc1715183 (DOI)000423783200020 ()29385366 (PubMedID)
Note

WoS title: Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with Dabigatran after PCI in Atrial Fibrillation REPLY

Available from: 2018-05-08 Created: 2018-05-08 Last updated: 2018-05-08Bibliographically approved
Hijazi, Z., Hohnloser, S. H., Oldgren, J., Andersson, U., Connolly, S. J., Eikelboom, J. W., . . . Wallentin, L. (2018). Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation in relation to renal function over time-A RE-LY trial analysis. American Heart Journal, 198, 169-177
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation in relation to renal function over time-A RE-LY trial analysis
Show others...
2018 (English)In: American Heart Journal, ISSN 0002-8703, E-ISSN 1097-6744, Vol. 198, p. 169-177Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Renal function may decline over time, and the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in atrial fibrillation (AF) in relation to renal function changes are unknown.& para;& para;Methods: The RE-LY trial randomized 18,113 patients with AF to 2 doses of dabigatran or warfarin for stroke prevention. Serial creatinine measurements were available in 16,988 patients. The relations between treatment, outcomes, and renal function (Cockcroft-Gault) were investigated using Cox-regression (1) with renal function as a time-dependent covariate and (2) according to worsening renal function (WRF) during follow-up, predefined as a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate >20% from baseline.& para;& para;Results: During a median follow-up of 1.8 years, 4,106 (24.2%) participants were observed to have WRF, and 12,882 (75.8%) had stable renal function. The risks of all-cause mortality and major bleeding were higher in patients with WRF versus those with stable renal function (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 2.17 [1.81-2.59] and 1.43 [1.19-1.71]. respectively; both P < .0005). The efficacy and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin were similar irrespective of renal function changes over time (interaction P values >= .13 in both models). Dabigatran 110 mg showed a greater relative risk reduction of major bleeding in patients with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate >80 mL/min) during follow-up (interaction P= .026).& para;& para;Conclusions: In AF, WRF was associated with a higher risk of death and major bleeding. The efficacy and safety profile of dabigatran compared with warfarin was similar irrespective of renal function changes over time. Dabigatran 110 mg showed a greater relative risk reduction of major bleeding in patients with normal renal function during follow-up.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MOSBY-ELSEVIER, 2018
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-352697 (URN)10.1016/j.ahj.2017.10.015 (DOI)000430004300023 ()29653640 (PubMedID)
Funder
AstraZeneca
Available from: 2018-06-08 Created: 2018-06-08 Last updated: 2018-06-08Bibliographically approved
Kotecha, D., Breithardt, G., Camm, A. J., Lip, G. Y., Schotten, U., Ahlsson, A., . . . Kirchhof, P. (2018). Integrating new approaches to atrial fibrillation management: the 6th AFNET/EHRA Consensus Conference.. Europace, 20(3), 395-407
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Integrating new approaches to atrial fibrillation management: the 6th AFNET/EHRA Consensus Conference.
Show others...
2018 (English)In: Europace, ISSN 1099-5129, E-ISSN 1532-2092, Vol. 20, no 3, p. 395-407Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There are major challenges ahead for clinicians treating patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The population with AF is expected to expand considerably and yet, apart from anticoagulation, therapies used in AF have not been shown to consistently impact on mortality or reduce adverse cardiovascular events. New approaches to AF management, including the use of novel technologies and structured, integrated care, have the potential to enhance clinical phenotyping or result in better treatment selection and stratified therapy. Here, we report the outcomes of the 6th Consensus Conference of the Atrial Fibrillation Network (AFNET) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), held at the European Society of Cardiology Heart House in Sophia Antipolis, France, 17-19 January 2017. Sixty-two global specialists in AF and 13 industry partners met to develop innovative solutions based on new approaches to screening and diagnosis, enhancing integration of AF care, developing clinical pathways for treating complex patients, improving stroke prevention strategies, and better patient selection for heart rate and rhythm control. Ultimately, these approaches can lead to better outcomes for patients with AF.

Keywords
Anticoagulation, Atrial fibrillation, Bleeding, Catheter ablation, Integrated care, Outcomes, Quality of care, Rate control, Research, Research priorities, Rhythm control, Screening, Stroke, Technology
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-342936 (URN)10.1093/europace/eux318 (DOI)000426824100003 ()29300976 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2018-02-23 Created: 2018-02-23 Last updated: 2018-05-23Bibliographically approved
Steffel, J., Verhamme, P., Potpara, T. S., Albaladejo, P., Antz, M., Desteghe, L., . . . Heidbulchel, H. (2018). The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. European Heart Journal, 39(16), 1330-1393
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation
Show others...
2018 (English)In: European Heart Journal, ISSN 0195-668X, E-ISSN 1522-9645, Vol. 39, no 16, p. 1330-1393Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The current manuscript is the second update of the original Practical Guide, published in 2013 [Heidbuchel et al. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2013;15:625-651; Heidbuchel et at Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2015;17:1467-1507]. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are an alternative for vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and have emerged as the preferred choice, particularly in patients newly started on anticoagulation. Both physicians and patients are becoming more accustomed to the use of these drugs in clinical practice. However, many unresolved questions on how to optimally use these agents in specific clinical situations remain. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) set out to coordinate a unified way of informing physicians on the use of the different NOACs. A writing group identified 20 topics of concrete clinical scenarios for which practical answers were formulated, based on available evidence. The 20 topics are as follows i.e., (1) Eligibility for NOACs; (2) Practical start-up and follow-up scheme for patients on NOACs; (3) Ensuring adherence to prescribed oral anticoagulant intake; (4) Switching between anticoagulant regimens; (5) Pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of NOACs; (6) NOACs in patients with chronic kidney or advanced liver disease; (7) How to measure the anticoagulant effect of NOACs; (8) NOAC plasma level measurement rare indications, precautions, and potential pitfalls; (9) How to deal with dosing errors; (10) What to do if there is a (suspected) overdose without bleeding, or a clotting test is indicating a potential risk of bleeding; (11) Management of bleeding under NOAC therapy; (12) Patients undergoing a planned invasive procedure, surgery or ablation; (13) Patients requiring an urgent surgical intervention; (14) Patients with AF and coronary artery disease; (15) Avoiding confusion with NOAC dosing across indications; (16) Cardioversion in a NOAC-treated patient; (17) AF patients presenting with acute stroke while on NOACs; (18) NOACs in special situations; (19) Anticoagulation in AF patients with a malignancy; and (20) Optimizing dose adjustments of VKA. Additional information and downloads of the text and anticoagulation cards in different languages can be found on an EHRA website (www.NOACforAF.eu).

National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-354959 (URN)10.1093/eurheartj/ehy136 (DOI)000430725600007 ()29562325 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2018-06-25 Created: 2018-06-25 Last updated: 2018-06-25Bibliographically approved
Batra, G., Lindhagen, L., Andell, P., Erlinge, D., James, S., Spaak, J. & Oldgren, J. (2017). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers are associated with improved outcome but do not prevent new-onset atrial fibrillation after acute myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 6(3), Article ID e005165.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers are associated with improved outcome but do not prevent new-onset atrial fibrillation after acute myocardial infarction
Show others...
2017 (English)In: Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, ISSN 2047-9980, E-ISSN 2047-9980, Vol. 6, no 3, article id e005165Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Treatment with renin‐angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors might restrain the structural/electrical remodeling associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). Limited evidence exists regarding the potential benefits of RAS inhibition post‐acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with AF. This study sought to assess the association between RAS inhibition and all‐cause mortality and new‐onset AF in patients with/without congestive heart failure (CHF) post‐AMI.

Methods and Results Patients hospitalized for AMI between 2006 and 2012 were identified in Swedish registries. Patients were stratified in 4 subgroups; patients with CHF and AF (n=11 489); patients with CHF without AF (n=31 676); patients with AF without CHF (n=10 066); and patients without both CHF and AF (n=59 417). Patients exposed to RAS inhibition were compared to nontreated. Three‐year risk of all‐cause mortality and new‐onset AF was assessed using adjusted Cox regression analyses. At discharge, 83 291 (73.9%) patients received RAS inhibition. RAS inhibition was associated with lower 3‐year risk of all‐cause mortality in CHF patients with AF, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI 0.75 (0.70–0.81), CHF patients without AF, HR 0.65 (0.60–0.69), AF patients without CHF, HR 0.82 (0.75–0.90), and in patients without CHF and AF, HR 0.76 (0.72–0.81), respectively. RAS inhibition was not associated with lower 3‐year risk of new‐onset AF in patients without AF but with/without CHF; HR 0.96 (0.84–1.10) and 1.12 (1.02–1.22), respectively.

Conclusions RAS inhibition post‐AMI was associated with lower risk of all‐cause mortality. In patients with/without CHF, RAS inhibition was not associated with lower incidence of new‐onset AF.

Keywords
atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-317878 (URN)10.1161/JAHA.116.005165 (DOI)000399322900044 ()28320744 (PubMedID)
Funder
Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
Available from: 2017-03-21 Created: 2017-03-21 Last updated: 2017-11-29Bibliographically approved
Hijazi, Z., Oldgren, J., Siegbahn, A. & Wallentin, L. (2017). Application of Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Clinical Chemistry, 63(11), 152-164
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Application of Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
2017 (English)In: Clinical Chemistry, ISSN 0009-9147, E-ISSN 1530-8561, Vol. 63, no 11, p. 152-164Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia and an important contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Several strategies have been proposed for prediction of outcomes and individualization of treatments to better balance the benefits of stroke prevention and risks of bleeding during anticoagulation. CONTENT: The availability of analytically more specific and sensitive methods to measure circulating biomarkers of cellular and organ stress and dysfunction has led to testing of their utility in several cardiovascular conditions. In patients with atrial fibrillation, biomarkers of myocardial injury (troponin) and cardiovascular stress and dysfunction (natriuretic peptides, growth differentiation factor 15), myocardial fibrosis (galectin-3), renal dysfunction (creatinine, cystatin C), inflammation (C reactive protein, cytokines) and coagulation activity (D-dimer) have been found associated with underlying pathophysiology, clinical outcomes and effects of treatment. Measurements of these markers might therefore expand the understanding of the pathophysiology, improve risk assessment and optimize treatment in individual patients with atrial fibrillation. SUMMARY: Biomarkers for risk stratification have potential roles as tools for evaluation of patients with atrial fibrillation and for selection of the best treatment strategies to prevent stroke, major bleeding, and mortality.

National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-319170 (URN)10.1373/clinchem.2016.255182 (DOI)000395048800024 ()
Funder
AstraZenecaGlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
Available from: 2017-03-31 Created: 2017-03-31 Last updated: 2017-04-28Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-9969-3921

Search in DiVA

Show all publications