uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Wangel, Marcus
Publications (2 of 2) Show all publications
Wangel, M. (2018). Deep Roots and Tangled Branches: Bureaucracy and Collaboration in Natural Resource Governance in South India. (Doctoral dissertation). Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Deep Roots and Tangled Branches: Bureaucracy and Collaboration in Natural Resource Governance in South India
2018 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This is a study about collaboration within bureaucracies tasked with natural resource management in the contemporary Global South. It seeks to fill a considerable knowledge gap in the extant literature by exploring how individual public officials perceive the policy environment they work in. These individuals face multiple pressures to work more collaboratively yet the ways in which they are incentivised and develop goals and strategies for collaboration have been neglected in past research. A deeper understanding of this process is essential as public officials are largely responsible for implementing policies ensuring the welfare of millions of deprived people in rural areas, and for safeguarding the sustainable use of the natural commons.

This book is an institutional analysis of the drivers of collaboration at the individual level. It builds on immersive ethnographic fieldwork on the forest bureaucracy in Kerala, South India where field observations and ninety interviews were conducted with state forest officials. The empirical analysis finds that the majority of officials are in favour of working more collaboratively for a plurality of reasons, but perceive themselves constrained by the formal institutional setup of the forest bureaucracy. To mitigate these limitations forest officials design numerous boundary-spanning, informal networks that function as vehicles of institutionalised coordination and collaboration.

Importantly, the officials develop preferences for joint action on policy issues which they perceive the formal organisation is incapable of delivering, not least improved forest livelihoods. These findings are a significant contribution and stand in contrast to most previous related research which has focused on issues of bureaucratic malfeasance in the context of natural resource governance. The findings are also noteworthy as they point to a rich variety of more nuanced roles and abilities individual public officials in India may hold, beyond that of the stereotype corrupt bureaucrat.

In addition to the contextualised and vivified empirical description of informal collaboration this study makes two additional contributions. First, it highlights and demonstrates the utility of an ethnographic approach to the study of informal institutions and institutionally constrained behaviour in settings that are little studied and hard to access. Second, it contributes to theoretical discussions on the interplay between formal and informal institutions. In particular this concerns the rationality and necessity of informal strategies when formal institutional frameworks impose constraints on individual agents or lack the capacity to solve complex problems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2018. p. 262
Series
Skrifter utgivna av Statsvetenskapliga föreningen i Uppsala, ISSN 0346-7538 ; 200
Keywords
collaboration, networks, governance, development administration, bureaucracy, public officials, roles, institutional analysis, informal institutions, rules-in-use, political ethnography, natural resource governance, forest governance, common pool resources, India, Kerala
National Category
Political Science
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-348088 (URN)978-91-513-0323-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
2018-06-05, Brusewitz, Östra Ågatan 19, Uppsala, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2018-05-09 Created: 2018-04-10 Last updated: 2018-07-04
Wangel, M. & Blomkvist, H. (2013). Rural Forest Management in Sierra Leone: The Role of Economic (In)Equality in Facilitating Collective Action. Journal of Development Studies, 49(11), 1564-1578
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Rural Forest Management in Sierra Leone: The Role of Economic (In)Equality in Facilitating Collective Action
2013 (English)In: Journal of Development Studies, ISSN 0022-0388, E-ISSN 1743-9140, Vol. 49, no 11, p. 1564-1578Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

While significant theoretical developments have been made in the research on common pool resources, heterogeneity remains a contested issue. Focusing on economic inequality, one particular aspect of heterogeneity, we examine its impact in facilitating cooperation in two rural forest communities in Sierra Leone. The findings reinforce prevalent ambiguities in the literature: in the context of economic inequality cooperation was thriving, while in the setting of uniform poverty cooperation was largely absent. Though further research is imperative, the key recommendation is that policies directed towards rural communities should take into account their ability to craft robust self-governing systems.

National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-209699 (URN)10.1080/00220388.2013.800860 (DOI)000327186300008 ()
Available from: 2013-10-24 Created: 2013-10-24 Last updated: 2018-01-11Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications