uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Gottwald, Janna, Dr
Alternative names
Biography [eng]

I am a developmental psychologist and movement scientist. Currently, I am leading the three-year longitudinal project An Embodied Account of Early Executive Functioning funded by the Swedish Research Council. This 3-years project seeks to understand the early links between infants’ body movements and their cognitive abilities. Generally, my research focuses on sensorimotor and cognitive development from infancy to middle childhood. I am especially passionate about embodied cognitive science, dynamic systems approaches, and active/direct perception perspectives.

Publications (10 of 12) Show all publications
Gottwald, J., Gredebäck, G. & Lindskog, M. (2019). Two-step actions in infancy—the TWAIN model. Experimental Brain Research
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Two-step actions in infancy—the TWAIN model
2019 (English)In: Experimental Brain Research, ISSN 0014-4819, E-ISSN 1432-1106Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this paper, we propose a novel model—the TWAIN model—to describe the durations of two-step actions in a reach-to-place task in human infants. Previous research demonstrates that infants and adults plan their actions across multiple steps. They adjust, for instance, the velocity of a reaching action depending on what they intend to do with the object once it is grasped. Despite these findings and irrespective of the larger context in which the action occurs, current models (e.g., Fitts’ law) target single, isolated actions, as, for example, pointing to a goal. In the current paper, we develop and empirically test a more ecologically valid model of two-step action planning. More specifically, 61 18-month olds took part in a reach-to-place task and their reaching and placing durations were measured with a motion-capture system. Our model explained the highest amount of variance in placing duration and outperformed six previously suggested models, when using model comparison. We show that including parameters of the first action step, here the duration of the reaching action, can improve the description of the second action step, here the duration of the placing action. This move towards more ecologically valid models of action planning contributes knowledge as well as a framework for assessing human machine interactions. The TWAIN model provides an updated way to quantify motor learning by the time these abilities develop, which might help to assess performance in typically developing human children.

National Category
Social Sciences Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-390180 (URN)10.1007/s00221-019-05604-0 (DOI)
Funder
EU, European Research Council, ERC-StG CACTUS 312292Swedish Research Council, VR-PG 2017-01504
Available from: 2019-08-06 Created: 2019-08-06 Last updated: 2019-08-06
Gottwald, J. M., de Bortoli Vizioli, A., Lindskog, M., Nyström, P., Ekberg, T. L., von Hofsten, C. & Gredebäck, G. (2017). Infants prospectively control reaching based on the difficulty of future actions: To what extent can infants' multiple step actions be explained by Fitts' law?. Developmental Psychology, 53(1), 4-12
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Infants prospectively control reaching based on the difficulty of future actions: To what extent can infants' multiple step actions be explained by Fitts' law?
Show others...
2017 (English)In: Developmental Psychology, ISSN 0012-1649, E-ISSN 1939-0599, Vol. 53, no 1, p. 4-12Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Prospective motor control, a key element of action planning, is the ability to adjust one's actions with respect to task demands and action goals in an anticipatory manner. The current study investigates whether 14-month-olds can prospectively control their reaching actions based on the difficulty of the subsequent action. We used a reach-to-place task, with difficulty of the placing action varied by goal size and goal distance. To target prospective motor control, we determined the kinematics of the prior reaching movements using a motion-tracking system. Peak velocity of the first movement unit of the reach served as indicator for prospective motor control. Both difficulty aspects (goal size and goal distance) affected prior reaching, suggesting that both these aspects of the subsequent action have an impact on the prior action. The smaller the goal size and the longer the distance to the goal, the slower infants were in the beginning of their reach toward the object. Additionally, we modeled movement times of both reaching and placing actions using a formulation of Fitts' law (as in heading). The model was significant for placement and reaching movement times. These findings suggest that 14-month-olds can plan their future actions and prospectively control their related movements with respect to future task difficulties.

Keywords
prospective motor control, action planning, action sequence, action development, movement unit, Fitts' law, infancy
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-297638 (URN)10.1037/dev0000212 (DOI)000391700500002 ()28026189 (PubMedID)
Funder
EU, European Research Council, 289404
Available from: 2016-06-26 Created: 2016-06-26 Last updated: 2017-11-28Bibliographically approved
Gottwald, J. M., Achermann, S., Marciszko, C., Lindskog, M. & Gredebäck, G. (2016). An embodied account of early executive functions development: Prospective motor control in infancy is related to prohibition and working memory. Psychological Science, 27
Open this publication in new window or tab >>An embodied account of early executive functions development: Prospective motor control in infancy is related to prohibition and working memory
Show others...
2016 (English)In: Psychological Science, ISSN 0956-7976, E-ISSN 1467-9280, Vol. 27Article in journal (Refereed) Published
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-297641 (URN)
Available from: 2016-06-26 Created: 2016-06-26 Last updated: 2017-11-28
Gottwald, J. M., Achermann, S., Marciszko, C., Lindskog, M. & Gredebäck, G. (2016). An Embodied Account of Early Executive-Function Development: Prospective Motor Control in Infancy Is Related to Inhibition and Working Memory. Psychological Science, 27(12), 1600-1610
Open this publication in new window or tab >>An Embodied Account of Early Executive-Function Development: Prospective Motor Control in Infancy Is Related to Inhibition and Working Memory
Show others...
2016 (English)In: Psychological Science, ISSN 0956-7976, E-ISSN 1467-9280, Vol. 27, no 12, p. 1600-1610Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The importance of executive functioning for later life outcomes, along with its potential to be positively affected by intervention programs, motivates the need to find early markers of executive functioning. In this study, 18-month-olds performed three executive-function tasksinvolving simple inhibition, working memory, and more complex inhibitionand a motion-capture task assessing prospective motor control during reaching. We demonstrated that prospective motor control, as measured by the peak velocity of the first movement unit, is related to infants' performance on simple-inhibition and working memory tasks. The current study provides evidence that motor control and executive functioning are intertwined early in life, which suggests an embodied perspective on executive-functioning development. We argue that executive functions and prospective motor control develop from a common source and a single motive: to control action. This is the first demonstration that low-level movement planning is related to higher-order executive control early in life.

Keywords
prospective motor control, motor development, executive functions, reaching, infancy
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-314054 (URN)10.1177/0956797616667447 (DOI)000390582500006 ()
Funder
EU, European Research Council, 312292
Available from: 2017-01-26 Created: 2017-01-26 Last updated: 2017-11-29Bibliographically approved
Gottwald, J. M., Elsner, B. & Pollatos, O. (2015). Good is up-spatial metaphors in action observation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article ID 1605.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Good is up-spatial metaphors in action observation
2015 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, ISSN 1664-1078, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 6, article id 1605Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Positive objects or actions are associated with physical highness, whereas negative objects or actions are related to physical lowness. Previous research suggests that metaphorical connection ("good is up" or "bad is down") between spatial experience and evaluation of objects is grounded in actual experience with the body. Prior studies investigated effects of spatial metaphors with respect to verticality of either static objects or self-performed actions. By presenting videos of object placements, the current three experiments combined vertically-located stimuli with observation of vertically-directed actions. As expected, participants' ratings of emotionally-neutral objects were systematically influenced by the observed vertical positioning, that is, ratings were more positive for objects that were observed being placed up as compared to down. Moreover, effects were slightly more pronounced for "bad is down," because only the observed downward, but not the upward, action led to different ratings as compared to a medium-positioned action. Last, some ratings were even affected by observing only the upward/downward action, without seeing the final vertical placement of the object. Thus, both, a combination of observing a vertically-directed action and seeing a vertically-located object, and observing a vertically-directed action alone, affected participants' evaluation of emotional valence of the involved object. The present findings expand the relevance of spatial metaphors to action observation, thereby giving new impetus to embodied-cognition research.

Keywords
embodied cognition, spatial metaphors, emotional valence, action observation, action perception
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-267669 (URN)10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01605 (DOI)000363863600001 ()26539147 (PubMedID)
Funder
German Research Foundation (DFG), GRK 1668/1German Research Foundation (DFG), PO 1011/2-1EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, 289404
Available from: 2015-11-25 Created: 2015-11-25 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved
Gottwald, J., Hofsten, von, C. & Gredebäck, G. (2015). Infants’ Prospective Control during Object Manipulation. In: : . Paper presented at BCCC15, Budapest, Hungary (Symposium Talk). January 2015..
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Infants’ Prospective Control during Object Manipulation
2015 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Other academic)
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-284521 (URN)
Conference
BCCC15, Budapest, Hungary (Symposium Talk). January 2015.
Available from: 2016-04-18 Created: 2016-04-18 Last updated: 2017-01-25
Gottwald, J. & Gredebäck, G. (2015). Infants’ Prospective Control during Object Manipulation in an Uncertain Environment. In: : . Paper presented at 2015 Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. March 2015..
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Infants’ Prospective Control during Object Manipulation in an Uncertain Environment
2015 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Other academic)
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-284511 (URN)
Conference
2015 Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. March 2015.
Available from: 2016-04-18 Created: 2016-04-18 Last updated: 2017-01-25
Gottwald, J. M. & Gredebäck, G. (2015). Infants' prospective control during object manipulation in an uncertain environment. Experimental Brain Research, 233(8), 2383-2390
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Infants' prospective control during object manipulation in an uncertain environment
2015 (English)In: Experimental Brain Research, ISSN 0014-4819, E-ISSN 1432-1106, Vol. 233, no 8, p. 2383-2390Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study investigates how infants use visual and sensorimotor information to prospectively control their actions. We gave 14-month-olds two objects of different weight and observed how high they were lifted, using a Qualisys Motion Capture System. In one condition, the two objects were visually distinct (different color condition) in another they were visually identical (same color condition). Lifting amplitudes of the first movement unit were analyzed in order to assess prospective control. Results demonstrate that infants lifted a light object higher than a heavy object, especially when vision could be used to assess weight (different color condition). When being confronted with two visually identical objects of different weight (same color condition), infants showed a different lifting pattern than what could be observed in the different color condition, expressed by a significant interaction effect between object weight and color condition on lifting amplitude. These results indicate that (a) visual information about object weight can be used to prospectively control lifting actions and that (b) infants are able to prospectively control their lifting actions even without visual information about object weight. We argue that infants, in the absence of reliable visual information about object weight, heighten their dependence on non-visual information (tactile, sensorimotor memory) in order to estimate weight and pre-adjust their lifting actions in a prospective manner.

Keywords
Prospective control, Object manipulation, Sensorimotor, Action, Motor development, Motor control
National Category
Neurology Neurosciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-260605 (URN)10.1007/s00221-015-4308-7 (DOI)000358322500014 ()25963753 (PubMedID)
Funder
EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, 289404
Note

Funding: ERC-StG CACTUS, 312292

Available from: 2015-08-24 Created: 2015-08-21 Last updated: 2018-01-11Bibliographically approved
Gottwald, J., Nyström, P., Ekberg, T., Hofsten, von, C. & Gredebäck, G. (2015). What’s next? Infants Prospectively Control their Reaching Movements Depending on the Difficulty of their Subsequent Action. In: : . Paper presented at Action Development: From Infancy to Adulthood. International Symposium on Action Research, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. September 2015..
Open this publication in new window or tab >>What’s next? Infants Prospectively Control their Reaching Movements Depending on the Difficulty of their Subsequent Action
Show others...
2015 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Other academic)
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-284518 (URN)
Conference
Action Development: From Infancy to Adulthood. International Symposium on Action Research, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. September 2015.
Available from: 2016-04-18 Created: 2016-04-18 Last updated: 2017-01-25
Gottwald, J., von Hofsten, C. & Gredebäck, G. (2014). Infants’ adaptation to object weight. In: : . Paper presented at International Conference on Infant Studies, Berlin, 3-5 July 2014.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Infants’ adaptation to object weight
2014 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-247992 (URN)
Conference
International Conference on Infant Studies, Berlin, 3-5 July 2014
Available from: 2015-03-25 Created: 2015-03-25 Last updated: 2017-01-25
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications