uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Publications (2 of 2) Show all publications
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Reply to Caetano-Anolles et al. comment on "Empirical genome evolution models root the tree of life"
2018 (English)In: Biochimie, ISSN 0300-9084, E-ISSN 1638-6183, Vol. 149, p. 137-138Article in journal, Letter (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

We recently analyzed the robustness of competing evolution models developed to identify the root of the Tree of Life: 1) An empirical Sankoff parsimony (ESP) model (Harish and Kurland, 2017), which is a nonstationary and directional evolution model; and 2) An a priori ancestor (APA) model (Kim and Caetano-Anolles, 2011) that is a stationary and reversible evolution model. Both Bayesian model selection tests as well as maximum parsimony analyses demonstrate that the ESP model is, overwhelmingly, the better model. Moreover, we showed that the APA model is not only sensitive to artifacts, but also that the underlying assumptions are neither empirically grounded nor biologically realistic.

Evolution, Phylogenomics, Proteome, Selection, Tree of life
National Category
Evolutionary Biology
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-362652 (URN)10.1016/j.biochi.2018.04.002 (DOI)000434053100015 ()29631014 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2018-10-16 Created: 2018-10-16 Last updated: 2018-10-16Bibliographically approved
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Mitochondria are not captive bacteria
2017 (English)In: Journal of Theoretical Biology, ISSN 0022-5193, E-ISSN 1095-8541, Vol. 434, p. 88-98Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Lynn Sagan's conjecture (1967) that three of the fundamental organelles observed in eukaryote cells, specifically mitochondria, plastids and flagella were once free-living primitive (prokaryotic) cells was accepted after considerable opposition. Even though the idea was swiftly refuted for the specific case of origins of flagella in eukaryotes, the symbiosis model in general was accepted for decades as a realistic hypothesis to describe the endosymbiotic origins of eukaryotes. However, a systematic analysis of the origins of the mitochondrial proteome based on empirical genome evolution models now indicates that 97% of modern mitochondrial protein domains as well their homologues in bacteria and archaea were present in the universal common ancestor (UCA) of the modern tree of life (ToL). These protein domains are universal modular building blocks of modern genes and genomes, each of which is identified by a unique tertiary structure and a specific biochemical function as well as a characteristic sequence profile. Further, phylogeny reconstructed from genome-scale evolution models reveals that Eukaryotes and Akaryotes (archaea and bacteria) descend independently from UCA. That is to say, Eukaryotes and Akaryotes are both primordial lineages that evolved in parallel. Finally, there is no indication of massive inter-lineage exchange of coding sequences during the descent of the two lineages. Accordingly, we suggest that the evolution of the mitochondrial proteome was autogenic (endogenic) and not endosymbiotic (exogenic).

National Category
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-340894 (URN)10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.011 (DOI)000413888500012 ()28754286 (PubMedID)
Swedish Research CouncilKnut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
Available from: 2018-02-07 Created: 2018-02-07 Last updated: 2018-02-07Bibliographically approved
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0001-7468-7317

Search in DiVA

Show all publications