uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Weighing Animal Lives: A Critical Assessment of Justification and Prioritization in Animal-Rights Theories
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Theology, Department of Theology, Ethics and Philosophy of Religion. (Ethics)
2009 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The project underlying this dissertation aims at analyzing three pro-animal-rights theories, evaluating the theories, and outlining an alternative theoretical account of animal rights. The analytical categories are justification and function of animal rights, the definition of the right holder, and the resolution approach to rights conflict. The categories are applied to a naturalist, a theocentric, and a contractarian approach to defend animal rights. The evaluation is substantiated by the assumption that rights are meant to protect less powerful beings against more powerful aggressors. The constructive segment is an investigation into what extent identified disadvantages of the theories can be avoided by outlining a new model for animal rights.

The analyses and evaluation suggest that all three theories are at risk of contradicting the proper function of rights-based theories. Tom Regan’s naturalist account of animal rights includes a logical possibility to sacrifice less capable beings for the sake of more capable beings. Andrew Linzey’s theocentric case for animal rights may sometimes mean that vulnerable human persons should be sacrificed for more powerful non-human beings. Mark Rowlands’ outlined contractarian model, further reconstructed in this work, fails to provide a way to resolve rights conflicts, making the function of rights inapplicable to conflicts.

In conclusion, it is suggested that defining the right holder as a self-preservative being can be supported by, at least, the contractarian rationale. That would also conform to the proper function of rights-based theories. It is also suggested that this means that rights conflicts should be resolved by a voluntary sacrifice of the most powerful being. Practical circumstances should be created where such voluntarity is both genuine and rationally possible.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. , p. 345
Series
Uppsala Studies in Social Ethics, ISSN 0346-6507 ; 38
Keywords [en]
Animal rights, justification, prioritization, applied ethics, proper function, justice, rights language, vivisection, rights conflict
Research subject
Ethics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-107288ISBN: 978-91-554-7576-5 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-107288DiVA, id: diva2:228824
Public defence
2009-09-25, Ihresalen, Thunbergsvägen 3B, Campus Engelska Parken, Uppsala University, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2009-09-01 Created: 2009-08-04 Last updated: 2014-09-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1748 kB)1433 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1748 kBChecksum SHA-512
2d7d27c483cae2e307b323569d10d9c3e1e76040363793657022546a389dfeba4ccb020f45fec9545e9577377ee12327dcecb7918a6cbd5a778ced5b629c13d9
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
Buy this publication >>

Authority records BETA

Karlsson, Fredrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karlsson, Fredrik
By organisation
Ethics and Philosophy of Religion

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1433 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 4081 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf