uu.seUppsala universitets publikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Concurrent validity and stability of subgroup assignment based on three levels of pain condition severity in patients with musculoskeletal pain
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för neurovetenskap, Fysioterapi.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-9806-6793
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap, Livsstil och rehabilitering vid långvarig sjukdom.
Institutionen för medicin, avdelningen för samhällsmedicin och folkhälsa, Göteborgs universitet.
Department of Rheumatology, Karolinska university hospital.
Vise andre og tillknytning
(engelsk)Inngår i: Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Submitted
Abstract [en]

Pain screening instruments have been used to identify risk factors for poor prognosis and are recommended for the stratification of treatment for musculoskeletal pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the concurrent validity of subgroup assignment based on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire compared with reference instruments: The Pain Disability Index, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. A secondary aim was to investigate the stability of the subgroup assignment over a defined period of time. Participants (n=40) aged 18-65 years were recruited from five primary health care centers in Sweden. Data were collected using self-reported questionnaires. The subgroups based on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire were predefined to low, moderate or high pain condition severity. The reference instrument data were dichotomized into low or high level based on previously used cut-off scores. Concurrent validity was analyzed with Fisher´s exact test. Stability was calculated using quadraticweighted kappa analysis. The results indicated acceptable psychometric properties of the subgroup assignment based on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire regarding concurrent validity, and the stability over two to three weeks. To further increase validity, it is suggested that subgroup assignment is complemented with other measures assessing e.g. pain catastrophizing. In conclusion, assignment to subgroups with low, moderate and high pain condition severities based on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire, could be used as a valid base for stratified treatment for patients with musculoskeletal pain.   

Emneord [en]
Musculoskeletal pain, psychological factors, stratified care, screening instruments, primary care
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medicinsk vetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-328403OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-328403DiVA, id: diva2:1135325
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-08-22 Laget: 2017-08-22 Sist oppdatert: 2017-08-23bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Long-term perspectives on musculoskeletal pain: Health care utilization and integration of behavioral medicine treatment into physical therapy
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Long-term perspectives on musculoskeletal pain: Health care utilization and integration of behavioral medicine treatment into physical therapy
2017 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

There are currently no effective methods for treating and preventing chronic pain. The aim of this thesis was to study prognostic factors for health care utilization, and the long-term outcomes of tailored behavioral medicine treatment for patients with musculoskeletal pain. Another aim was to increase knowledge about physical therapists’ assessment and analysis of patients’ pain conditions and to investigate the potential of subgrouping patients based on prognostic factors.

Methods: In Study I, a prospective population-based cohort was followed over 21 years. Data from three measure points were analyzed: 1995 (n=2425), 2007 (n=1582) and 2016 (n=1184). Study II was a 10-year follow-up of randomized controlled trial (n=97), comparing tailored behavioral medicine treatment and exercise-based physical therapy. In Study III, a descriptive and explorative design was applied, using data from video-recordings of 12 physical therapists. In study IV, assignment to three subgroups based on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire was validated against reference instruments, and the stability between two points of measurement was investigated in patients (n=40) who were seeking primary health care due to musculoskeletal pain.

Results: Chronic pain, female gender and high age predict high health care utilization over 21 years, and a trajectory of stable high health care utilization over the entire period. The differences between groups in favor for tailored behavioral medicine treatment reported at post-treatment and after two years, were not maintained at the 10-year follow-up. A majority of the physical therapists assessed factors for poor prognosis. The analyses were mainly based on biomedical assessments and none of the physical therapists included behavioral factors. Subgroup assignment according to the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire appears to be valid and stable over time.

Conclusion: Prognostic factors such as chronic pain and female gender need to be considered when allocating health care resources and planning treatment to improve long-term outcomes. The treatment should also be tailored based on individual functional behavioral analyses of key behaviors and on patient´s biomedical and psychosocial condition, including strategies for maintenance of behavioral changes. Evidence-based methods for integrating behavioral medicine treatment into physical therapy need to be further evaluated and improved. 

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2017. s. 83
Serie
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 1360
Emneord
Chronic pain, health care utilization, behavioral medicine, stratified treatment, prognostic factors, physical therapy, primary care
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medicinsk vetenskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-328363 (URN)978-91-513-0044-3 (ISBN)
Disputas
2017-10-13, A7:107a, Biomedicinsk centrum, Husargatan 3, Uppsala, 09:00 (svensk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-09-21 Laget: 2017-08-22 Sist oppdatert: 2017-10-17

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Personposter BETA

Emilson, ChristinaDemmelmaier, IngridÅsenlöf, Pernilla

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Emilson, ChristinaDemmelmaier, IngridÅsenlöf, Pernilla
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 400 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf