Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublikasjoner fra Uppsala universitet
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Biobank research: who benefits from individual consent?
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap, Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik.
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap, Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik.
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap, Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7486-4678
2011 (engelsk)Inngår i: The BMJ, E-ISSN 1756-1833, Vol. 343, nr Oct 4, s. d5647-Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Requiring informed consent for research on stored tissue samples and associated data safeguards the autonomy rights of donors. But Joanna Stjernschantz Forsberg, Mats Hansson, and Stefan Eriksson argue that this policy not only defeats the interest of society but also runs counter to the interests of the individuals it purports to protect.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2011. Vol. 343, nr Oct 4, s. d5647-
Emneord [en]
Biobanks, informed consent, human rights, public good
Emneord [sv]
Biobanker, informerat samtycke, rättigheter, allmänintresse
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Bioetik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-164607DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5647ISI: 000295779300002PubMedID: 21972296OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-164607DiVA, id: diva2:468656
Tilgjengelig fra: 2011-12-21 Laget: 2011-12-21 Sist oppdatert: 2023-08-28
Inngår i avhandling
1. Biobank Research: Individual Rights and Public Benefit
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Biobank Research: Individual Rights and Public Benefit
2012 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this thesis is to investigate the relationship between individuals and society in the context of healthcare and medical research, more specifically concerning the rights and duties of individuals in regard to biobank-based research. My starting point is that we all have a strong vested interest in improved healthcare, and therefore the possibilities to conduct important research should be optimized. In the first article, I investigate whether individual results from research using samples in large-scale biobanks should be returned. I conclude that there is good reason not to implement such policies, and instead to allocate available resources to pursuing medical advances. In the second article, I compare consent for using stored samples in research with consent for organ donation, whereby many countries have adopted opt-out strategies in order to increase the number of organs available. I claim that the default position should be changed in biobank research as well, i.e. it should be presumed that individuals want to contribute rather than that they do not. In the third article, I argue that safeguarding autonomy by requiring informed consent for using samples in research not only defeats the interests of society but also runs counter to the interests of the individuals the policy purports to protect. Finally, in the fourth article I suggest that it is reasonable to view participation in medical research from the perspective of a social contract, built on our mutual need for medical advances, and that this implies that there is a moral duty to adhere to the contract by allowing one’s samples to be used in research. A central conclusion in this thesis is that biobank research should be viewed as a natural part of healthcare, like quality control, method development and teaching, and that as such, it ought to be endorsed and facilitated.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2012. s. 83
Serie
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 762
Emneord
Biobank, Ethics, Consent, Returning results, Individual rights, Public good
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medicinsk vetenskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-171898 (URN)978-91-554-8332-6 (ISBN)
Disputas
2012-10-06, Auditoriet Minus, Gustavianum, Akademigatan 3, Uppsala, 13:15 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-09-14 Laget: 2012-03-28 Sist oppdatert: 2013-01-17bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Person

Stjernschantz Forsberg, JoannaHansson, Mats G.Eriksson, Stefan

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Stjernschantz Forsberg, JoannaHansson, Mats G.Eriksson, Stefan
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
The BMJ

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 562 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf