uu.seUppsala universitets publikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Evidence from a Content Analysis of Ugandan Plenary Debates
Department of Political Science, Vanderbuilt University.
Uppsala universitet, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-3240-7019
Chr. Michelsen Institute.
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Politics & Gender, ISSN 1743-923X, E-ISSN 1743-9248, Vol. 13, nr 2, 276-304 s.Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Despite the popularity of electoral gender quotas, the substantive impact of quotas on the plenary behavior of members of parliament (MPs) has yet to be thoroughly empirically explored, and in particular, there is a dearth of evidence from non-Western cases. Here we create a unique content analysis dataset from 14 years (1998–2011) of plenary debates, including the contents of more than 150,000 unique MP speeches recorded in some 40,000 pages of the Ugandan parliamentary Hansard to test how MP characteristics affect patterns of gender-related legislative speech. We find that female MPs speak about issues related to women's interests significantly more than male MPs. Further, we find no evidence of significant differences between female MPs elected with and without quotas, suggesting that, in the Ugandan case, gender is a more salient predictor of the tendency to “speak for women” than electoral pathway. To our knowledge, this is the first study that examines the effectiveness of quotas in promoting women's substantive representation in parliamentary debates across all policy domains over a significant time period. We discuss the implications of these findings in the Ugandan context, as well as how our evidence speaks to substantive representation through reserved seat quotas in semi-authoritarian regimes more broadly.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2017. Vol. 13, nr 2, 276-304 s.
Emneord [en]
Gender quotas, Women's substantive representation, Uganda
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Statskunskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-299694DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X16000453ISI: 000401578800005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-299694DiVA: diva2:949951
Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-07-26 Laget: 2016-07-26 Sist oppdatert: 2017-06-13bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Josefsson, Cecilia

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Josefsson, Cecilia
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Politics & Gender

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 373 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf