Logotyp: till Uppsala universitets webbplats

uu.sePublikationer från Uppsala universitet
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
En oansenlig akvarell med en oerhörd signatur: En autenticitetsundersökning av en målning med konsthistoriens mest ökända underskrift – A. Hitler
Uppsala universitet, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Historisk-filosofiska fakulteten, Konstvetenskapliga institutionen.
2022 (Svenska)Självständigt arbete på avancerad nivå (masterexamen), 30 poäng / 45 hpStudentuppsats (Examensarbete)
Abstract [en]

The thesis examines Adolf Hitler as an artist and whether a watercolor bearing his name is authentic or a forgery. Young Hitler aspired to become a professional artist, and although never formally trained, supported himself as a painter in Vienna and Munich in 1910-1914. He continued painting as a soldier in World War I, but lack of evidence suggesting otherwise his independent artistic endeavors seem to have ended when he became involved in the Nazi party in 1919/1920. Hitler produced an estimated 450-500 watercolors mainly depicting architectural views copied from picture postcards, which later became valuable commodities in the Third Reich. The first forgeries emerged in the mid-1930s, and have since then become numerous. 

20 supposedly authentic art works published in second-hand sources were examined. 30 of Hitler’s artistic characteristics were listed, showing him to be a meticulous, albeit amateurish, copyist of architectural drawings but lacking basic technical skills and a disinterested colorist. He signed the paintings with black-letter and Antiqua fonts.

The Kitzbúhel (sic) watercolor depicts a scene in the Austrian town Kitzbühel. It became a hot spot for Nazis after the Anschluss, but Hitler does not seem to have visited nor had any known links to the town. Stylistic comparisons between the watercolor, reference works and picture postcards showed that the painting is true to Hitler’s style, and it is an accurate depiction of the motif during the early 1900s. Due to some significant stylistic incongruences it is, however, most likely a forgery.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2022. , s. 126
Nyckelord [en]
adolf, hitler, authentic, forgery, kitzbuhel, artist, painter, style, pictology, watercolor, painting
Nationell ämneskategori
Konstvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-477067OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-477067DiVA, id: diva2:1669298
Handledare
Examinatorer
Tillgänglig från: 2022-06-16 Skapad: 2022-06-14 Senast uppdaterad: 2022-06-16Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Av organisationen
Konstvetenskapliga institutionen
Konstvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 460 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf