Logotyp: till Uppsala universitets webbplats

uu.sePublikationer från Uppsala universitet
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gene Doping and the Responsibility of Bioethicists
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap, Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik. (Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics)
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap, Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik. (Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics)
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap, Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik. (Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics)
2011 (Engelska)Ingår i: Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, ISSN 1751-1321, E-ISSN 1751-133X, Vol. 5, nr 2, s. 149-160Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

In this paper we will argue: (1) that scholars, regardless of their normative stand against or for genetic enhancement indeed have a moral/professional obligation to hold on to a realistic and up-to-date conception of genetic enhancement; (2) that there is an unwarranted hype surrounding the issue of genetic enhancement in general, and gene doping in particular; and (3) that this hype is, at least partly, created due to a simplistic and reductionist conception of genetics often adopted by bioethicists.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2011. Vol. 5, nr 2, s. 149-160
Nyckelord [en]
genetic enhancement; gene-doping; sport
Nationell ämneskategori
Etik
Forskningsämne
Etik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-206595DOI: 10.1080/17511321.2010.536960OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-206595DiVA, id: diva2:644695
Tillgänglig från: 2013-09-02 Skapad: 2013-09-02 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-06Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. Transforming the Doping Culture: Whose responsibility, what responsibility?
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Transforming the Doping Culture: Whose responsibility, what responsibility?
2013 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

The doping culture represents an issue for sport and for society. Normative debates on doping have been mainly concerned with questions of the justifiability of doping. The practice of assigning responsibility for doping behaviour has chiefly been individual-based, focusing mainly on the individual athlete’s doping behaviour. The overarching aim of this thesis is to investigate the relevance and the importance of the ideas of responsibility in relation to ethical debates on doping. The more specific aim is to examine the possibility of broadening the scope of responsibility beyond the individual athlete, and to sketch a theoretical framework within which this expansion could be accommodated. In the first study, it is argued that bioethicists have a moral/professional responsibility to start out from a realistic and up-to-date view of genetics in ethical debates on gene doping, and that good bioethics requires good empirics. In study 2, the role played by affective processes in influencing athletes’ attitudes towards doping behaviour is investigated, both on an individual and on a collective level. It is concluded that an exclusive focus on individual-level rule violation and sanctions may entail overlooking the greater social picture and would prove to be ineffective in the long term. In study 3, the common doping-is-cheating arguments are examined and it is argued that they fail to capture vital features of people’s moral responses to doping behaviour. An alternative account of cheating in sport is presented in terms of failure to manifest good will and respect. It is concluded that putting cheating in the broader context of human interpersonal relationships makes evident the need to broaden the scope of moral responsibility and agency beyond the individual athlete. In study 4, the particular case of assigning responsibility for doping to sports physicians is used to examine the current individual-based approach to responsibility. This approach underestimates the scope of the responsibility by leaving out a range of other actors from the discourse of responsibility. The central conclusion of the thesis is that transforming the current doping culture requires broadening the scope of responsibility to include individuals and groups of individuals other than the athletes themselves.  

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2013. s. 72
Serie
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 931
Nyckelord
Doping, responsibility, prospective responsibilities, cheating, good will, interpersonal relations, sports
Nationell ämneskategori
Etik
Forskningsämne
Etik
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-206607 (URN)978-91-554-8738-6 (ISBN)
Disputation
2013-10-11, Auditorium Minus, Museum Gustavianum, Akademigatan 3, Uppsala, 13:15 (Engelska)
Opponent
Handledare
Tillgänglig från: 2013-09-20 Skapad: 2013-09-02 Senast uppdaterad: 2014-01-23

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltexthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2010.536960

Person

Atry, AshkanHansson, Mats G.Kihlbom, Ulrik

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Atry, AshkanHansson, Mats G.Kihlbom, Ulrik
Av organisationen
Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik
I samma tidskrift
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
Etik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 734 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf