uu.seUppsala universitets publikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Genital Evolution: Why Are Females Still Understudied?
Uppsala universitet, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Historisk-filosofiska fakulteten, Centrum för genusvetenskap.
2014 (Engelska)Ingår i: PLoS biology, ISSN 1544-9173, E-ISSN 1545-7885, Vol. 12, nr 5, s. e1001851-Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

The diversity, variability, and apparent rapid evolution of animal genitalia are a vivid focus of research in evolutionary biology, and studies exploring genitalia have dramatically increased over the past decade. These studies, however, exhibit a strong male bias, which has worsened since 2000, despite the fact that this bias has been explicitly pointed out in the past. Early critics argued that previous investigators too often considered only males and their genitalia, while overlooking female genitalia or physiology. Our analysis of the literature shows that overall this male bias has worsened with time. The degree of bias is not consistent between subdisciplines: studies of the lock-and-key hypothesis have been the most male focused, while studies of cryptic female choice usually consider both sexes. The degree of bias also differed across taxonomic groups, but did not associate with the ease of study of male and female genital characteristics. We argue that the persisting male bias in this field cannot solely be explained by anatomical sex differences influencing accessibility. Rather the bias reflects enduring assumptions about the dominant role of males in sex, and invariant female genitalia. New research highlights how rapidly female genital traits can evolve, and how complex coevolutionary dynamics between males and females can shape genital structures. We argue that understanding genital evolution is hampered by an outdated single-sex bias.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2014. Vol. 12, nr 5, s. e1001851-
Nationell ämneskategori
Mikrobiologi Genusstudier
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-228491DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001851ISI: 000336969200002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-228491DiVA, id: diva2:734209
Tillgänglig från: 2014-07-15 Skapad: 2014-07-15 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-05Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(788 kB)266 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 788 kBChecksumma SHA-512
e8be26c7fed8c5a64959c671aaf58f9a2256abb29da198bc087e797e24346acc167ee527cdfeb38468e39da4fd6af2a1f056780e07c97b7c27cc3bc4be0574e1
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext
Av organisationen
Centrum för genusvetenskap
I samma tidskrift
PLoS biology
MikrobiologiGenusstudier

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 266 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1810 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf