uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Independence is elusive: set size effects on encoding precision in visual search
Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
2013 (English)In: Journal of Vision, ISSN 1534-7362, E-ISSN 1534-7362, Vol. 13, no 5, article id 8Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Looking for a target in a visual scene becomes more difficult as the number of stimuli increases. In a signal detection theory view, this is due to the cumulative effect of noise in the encoding of the distractors, and potentially on top of that, to an increase of the noise (i.e., a decrease of precision) per stimulus with set size, reflecting divided attention. It has long been argued that human visual search behavior can be accounted for by the first factor alone. While such an account seems to be adequate for search tasks in which all distractors have the same, known feature value (i.e., are maximally predictable), we recently found a clear effect of set size on encoding precision when distractors are drawn from a uniform distribution (i.e., when they are maximally unpredictable). Here we interpolate between these two extreme cases to examine which of both conclusions holds more generally as distractor statistics are varied. In one experiment, we vary the level of distractor heterogeneity; in another we dissociate distractor homogeneity from predictability. In all conditions in both experiments, we found a strong decrease of precision with increasing set size, suggesting that precision being independent of set size is the exception rather than the rule.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 13, no 5, article id 8
Keywords [en]
visual search; visual attention; capacity limitations; precision; Bayesian inference
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-308848DOI: 10.1167/13.5.8.ISI: 000319813200008PubMedID: 23576114OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-308848DiVA, id: diva2:1050996
Available from: 2016-11-30 Created: 2016-11-30 Last updated: 2017-11-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1179 kB)63 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1179 kBChecksum SHA-512
f07519787f7c20460aaecdcf8eb95da2720ce13da02d2ae4083c30dd71b972067120c009eaa1077c41a0e370faaec73706218b1c6e9083782e1ce7f791492fbd
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Van den Berg, Ronald

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Van den Berg, Ronald
In the same journal
Journal of Vision
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 63 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 335 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf