uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology, Division of Visual Information and Interaction. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology, Computerized Image Analysis and Human-Computer Interaction.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology, Division of Visual Information and Interaction. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology, Computerized Image Analysis and Human-Computer Interaction. Uppsala Univ, Dept Informat Technol, Ctr Image Anal, Box 337, S-75105 Uppsala, Sweden..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics and Statistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5451-4563
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Journal of Dentistry, ISSN 0300-5712, E-ISSN 1879-176X, Vol. 69, p. 110-118Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To evaluate a novel methodology using industrial scanners as a reference, and assess in vivo accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners (IOS) and conventional impressions. Further, to evaluate IOS precision in vivo.

Methods: Four reference-bodies were bonded to the buccal surfaces of upper premolars and incisors in five subjects. After three reference-scans, ATOS Core 80 (ATOS), subjects were scanned three times with three IOS systems: 3M True Definition (3M), CEREC Omnicam (OMNI) and Trios 3 (TRIOS). One conventional impression (IMPR) was taken, 3M Impregum Penta Soft, and poured models were digitized with laboratory scanner 3shape D1000 (D1000). Best-fit alignment of reference-bodies and 3D Compare Analysis was performed. Precision of ATOS and D1000 was assessed for quantitative evaluation and comparison. Accuracy of IOS and IMPR were analyzed using ATOS as reference. Precision of IOS was evaluated through intra-system comparison.

Results: Precision of ATOS reference scanner (mean 0.6 mu m) and D1000 (mean 0.5 mu m) was high. Pairwise multiple comparisons of reference-bodies located in different tooth positions displayed a statistically significant difference of accuracy between two scanner-groups: 3M and TRIOS, over OMNI (p value range 0.0001 to 0.0006). IMPR did not show any statistically significant difference to IOS. However, deviations of IOS and IMPR were within a similar magnitude. No statistical difference was found for IOS precision.

Conclusion: The methodology can be used for assessing accuracy of IOS and IMPR in vivo in up to five units bilaterally from midline. 3M and TRIOS had a higher accuracy than OMNI. IMPR overlapped both groups. Clinical significance: Intraoral scanners can be used as a replacement for conventional impressions when restoring up to ten units without extended edentulous spans.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCI LTD , 2018. Vol. 69, p. 110-118
Keywords [en]
Digital impression, Intraoral scanner, Polyether impression, Accuracy, Precision, In vivo
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-349829DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.006ISI: 000425888000014PubMedID: 29246490OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-349829DiVA, id: diva2:1204135
Available from: 2018-05-07 Created: 2018-05-07 Last updated: 2018-05-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1223 kB)19 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1223 kBChecksum SHA-512
86670487aaff7eb4db28c5edc7e378304fdcf676442db553001f41852e26e2cb9de5f7b197700114f1690d02872f2bafe0ade6ed1259572f1ecd9fd25ea57f68
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Nedelcu, RobertOlsson, PontusNyström, IngelaRydén, JesperThor, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nedelcu, RobertOlsson, PontusNyström, IngelaRydén, JesperThor, Andreas
By organisation
Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryDivision of Visual Information and InteractionComputerized Image Analysis and Human-Computer InteractionApplied Mathematics and Statistics
In the same journal
Journal of Dentistry
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 19 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf