uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Unravelling the correlates of species richness and ecological uniqueness in a metacommunity of urban pond insects
Nat Environm Ctr, Finnish Environm Inst, Biodivers, Paavo Havaksen Tie 3, FI-90570 Oulu, Finland.
Univ Fed Goias, Dept Ecol, BR-74001970 Goiania, Go, Brazil.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3398-9399
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Biology, Department of Ecology and Genetics.
Swedish Museum Nat Hist, Dept Zool, Box 50007, SE-10405 Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Ecological Indicators, ISSN 1470-160X, E-ISSN 1872-7034, Vol. 73, p. 422-431Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

City ponds have the potential to harbour a rich biodiversity of aquatic insects despite being located in an urban landscape. However, our current knowledge on the correlates of pond biodiversity is limited and even less is known about the factors that influence the ecological uniqueness of urban ponds. The multiple environmental gradients, at different spatial scales, that may affect biodiversity and ecological uniqueness of urban ponds can thus be seen both as an opportunity and as a challenge for a study. In this study, we aimed to fill this gap by focusing on aquatic insect assemblages in 51 ponds in the Swedish city of Stockholm, using a metacommunity perspective. We found that species richness was primarily determined by the density of aquatic insects, water depth and proportion of buildings around the pond. The uniqueness of ponds was estimated as local contributions to beta diversity (LCBD), and it was primarily related to the proportion of arable land and industry around the ponds. With regard to the metacommunity we found two interesting patterns. First, there was a negative relationship between richness and LCBD. Second, biodiversity was spatially independent, suggesting that spatially-patterned dispersal did not structure species richness or LCBD. These last two patterns are important when considering conservation efforts of biodiversity in city ponds. We hence suggest that the conservation of insect biodiversity in urban pond should consider the surroundings of the ponds, and that high-richness ponds are not necessarily those that require most attention because they are not ecologically the most unique.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 73, p. 422-431
Keywords [en]
Aquatic insects, Beta diversity, Biodiversity indicators, Community ecology, Landscape features, Local conditions
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-359792DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.006ISI: 000398334400043OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-359792DiVA, id: diva2:1250458
Available from: 2018-09-24 Created: 2018-09-24 Last updated: 2018-09-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Johansson, Frank

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bini, Luis MauricioJohansson, Frank
By organisation
Department of Ecology and GeneticsAnimal ecology
In the same journal
Ecological Indicators
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf