uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of resection of the gastroesophageal junction and jejunal interposition (Merendino procedure) as a rescue procedure in patients with a failed redo antireflux procedure. A single-center experience
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, Centrum för klinisk forskning i Sörmland (CKFD). Karolinska Univ Hosp, Ctr Digest Dis, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Intervent & Technol CLINTEC, Div Surg, Stockholm, Sweden; Nykoping Hosp, Dept Surg, Nykoping, Sweden.
Karolinska Univ Hosp, Ctr Digest Dis, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Intervent & Technol CLINTEC, Div Surg, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Univ Hosp, Ctr Digest Dis, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Intervent & Technol CLINTEC, Div Surg, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Univ Hosp, Ctr Digest Dis, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Intervent & Technol CLINTEC, Div Surg, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: BMC Surgery, ISSN 1471-2482, E-ISSN 1471-2482, Vol. 18, article id 70Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Primary antireflux surgery has high success rates but 5 to 20% of patients undergoing antireflux operations can experience recurrent reflux and dysphagia, requiring reoperation. Different surgical approaches after failed fundoplication have been described in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate resection of the gastroesophageal junction with jejunal interposition (Merendino procedure) as a rescue procedure after failed fundoplication.

Methods: All patients who underwent a Merendino procedure at the Karolinska University Hospital between 2004 and 2012 after a failed antireflux fundoplication were identified. Data regarding previous surgical history, preoperative workup, postoperative complications, subsequent investigations and re-interventions were collected retrospectively. The follow-up also included questionnaires regarding quality of life, gastrointestinal function and the dumping syndrome.

Results: Twelve patients had a Merendino reconstruction. Ten patients had undergone at least two previous fundoplications, of which one patient had four such procedures. The main indication for surgery was epigastric and radiating back pain, with or without dysphagia. Postoperative complications occurred in 8/12 patients (67%). During a median follow-up of 35 months (range 20-61), four (25%) patients had an additional redo procedure with conversion to a Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy within 12 months, mainly due to obstructive symptoms that could not be managed conservatively or with endoscopic techniques. Questionnaires scores were generally poor in all dimensions.

Conclusions: In our experience, the Merendino procedure seems to be an unsuitable surgical option for patients who require an alternative surgical reconstruction due to a failed fundoplication. However, the small number of patients included in this study as well as the small number of participants who completed the postoperative workout limits this study.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 18, article id 70
Keywords [en]
Gastroesophageal reflux, Reoperation, Quality of life, Jejunal interposition, Merendino procedure
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-364188DOI: 10.1186/s12893-018-0401-8ISI: 000443358300002PubMedID: 30165834OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-364188DiVA, id: diva2:1259816
Available from: 2018-10-31 Created: 2018-10-31 Last updated: 2018-10-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(692 kB)52 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 692 kBChecksum SHA-512
03b5fde9fe5e9358b4a22e34980ac18d04759887f333844cb885c0812cf45e9276825a9d0fc52713870748053b50b68481e0bb8b60a31666b12e97c50763aa77
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Centrum för klinisk forskning i Sörmland (CKFD)
In the same journal
BMC Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 52 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 134 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf