uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Struggling for a feasible tool - the process of implementing a clinical pathway in intensive care: A grounded theory study
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Caring Sciences. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, Centrum för klinisk forskning i Sörmland (CKFD).
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Caring Sciences.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Caring Sciences.
Göteborgs universitet.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, ISSN 1472-6963, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 18, article id 831Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Clinical pathways can enhance care quality, promote patient safety and optimize resource utilization. However, they are infrequently utilized in intensive care. This study aimed to explain the implementation process of a clinical pathway based on a bottom-up approach in an intensive care context.

Methods: The setting was an 11-bed general intensive care unit in Sweden. An action research project was conducted to implement a clinical pathway for patients on mechanical ventilation. The project was managed by a local interprofessional core group and was externally facilitated by two researchers. Grounded theory was used by the researchers to explain the implementation process. The sampling in the study was purposeful and theoretical and included registered nurses (n31), assistant nurses (n26), anesthesiologists (n11), a physiotherapist (n1), first- and second-line managers (n2), and health records from patients on mechanical ventilation (n136). Data were collected from 2011 to 2016 through questionnaires, repeated focus groups, individual interviews, logbooks/field notes and health records. Constant comparative analysis was conducted, including both qualitative data and descriptive statistics from the quantitative data.

Results: A conceptual model of the clinical pathway implementation process emerged, and a central phenomenon, which was conceptualized as 'Struggling for a feasible tool,' was the core category that linked all categories. The phenomenon evolved from the 'Triggers' ('Perceiving suboptimal practice' and 'Receiving external inspiration and support'), pervaded the 'Implementation process' ('Contextual circumstances,' 'Processual circumstances' and 'Negotiating to achieve progress'), and led to the process 'Output' ('Varying utilization' and 'Improvements in understanding and practice'). The categories included both facilitating and impeding factors that made the implementation process tentative and prolonged but also educational.

Conclusions: The findings provide a novel understanding of a bottom-up implementation of a clinical pathway in an intensive care context. Despite resonating well with existing implementation frameworks/theories, the conceptual model further illuminates the complex interaction between different circumstances and negotiations and how this interplay has consequences for the implementation process and output. The findings advocate a bottom-up approach but also emphasize the need for strategic priority, interprofessional participation, skilled facilitators and further collaboration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 18, article id 831
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-364675DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3629-1ISI: 000449346000002PubMedID: 30400985OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-364675DiVA, id: diva2:1259839
Available from: 2018-10-31 Created: 2018-10-31 Last updated: 2019-01-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(905 kB)51 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 905 kBChecksum SHA-512
766095d497b1ab5183cd699ce9ad2154f50f2b60c95be2176efa57d3243d141b5fa8e06335333db817011a08f10668a0844c8a5d8d0790b6a3c63ba5a32d1e1d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Bjurling-Sjöberg, PetronellaWadensten, BarbroPöder, UlrikaNordgren, Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bjurling-Sjöberg, PetronellaWadensten, BarbroPöder, UlrikaNordgren, Lena
By organisation
Caring SciencesCentrum för klinisk forskning i Sörmland (CKFD)Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health EconomyAnesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 51 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 111 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf