Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Conspiracy Theories in Russian Security Thinking
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies. Russia and Eurasia Programme, Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden.
Russia and Eurasia Programme, Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden.
Russia and Eurasia Programme, Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden.
2022 (English)In: Journal of Strategic Studies, ISSN 0140-2390, E-ISSN 1743-937X, Vol. 45, no 3, p. 334-368Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Based on an analysis of around 500 texts from security-affiliated Russian academic journals and one newspaper over a ten-year period, this article details how conspiratorial ideas are spread, tolerated and legitimised within military institutions and official think tanks in Russia. Particular conspiracy theories systematically underpin a broader conspiratorial worldview, which in its basic orientation is anti-Western and illiberal, and which reinforces a perception of Russia as being under threat. As such, this phenomenon serves to justify and rationalise both Russian foreign policy conduct, as well as the targeted repression of various domestic groups as necessary for security reasons. We discuss whether the prevalence of conspiratorial ideas merely reflects an established worldview popular in certain circles or if it influences actual policy and outline some policy implications for the interpretation of Russian foreign policy conduct. The prevalence of conspiracy theories in renowned publications is a concern in itself since it hampers a genuine understanding of international affairs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2022. Vol. 45, no 3, p. 334-368
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-408690DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2020.1717954ISI: 000511812500001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-408690DiVA, id: diva2:1422990
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, 62/18Available from: 2020-04-11 Created: 2020-04-11 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Kragh, Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kragh, Martin
By organisation
Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies
In the same journal
Journal of Strategic Studies
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 276 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf