Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bootstrap Methods for Bias Correction and Confidence Interval Estimation for Nonlinear Quantile Regression of Longitudinal Data
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, Centre for Clinical Research, County of Västmanland.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3691-8326
2009 (English)In: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, ISSN 0094-9655, E-ISSN 1563-5163, Vol. 79, no 10, p. 1205-1218Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper examines the use of bootstrapping for bias correction and   calculation of confidence intervals (CIs) for a weighted nonlinear   quantile regression estimator adjusted to the case of longitudinal   data. Different weights and types of CIs are used and compared by   computer simulation using a logistic growth function and error terms   following an AR(1) model. The results indicate that bias correction   reduces the bias of a point estimator but fails for CI calculations. A   bootstrap percentile method and a normal approximation method perform   well for two weights when used without bias correction. Taking both   coverage and lengths of CIs into consideration, a non-bias-corrected   percentile method with an unweighted estimator performs best.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 79, no 10, p. 1205-1218
Keywords [en]
autocorrelated errors, bias reduction, dependent errors, median regression, panel data, repeated measurements
National Category
Computer and Information Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-94966DOI: 10.1080/00949650802221180ISI: 000270155800003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-94966DiVA, id: diva2:169003
Available from: 2006-10-19 Created: 2006-10-19 Last updated: 2018-01-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Estimation and Inference for Quantile Regression of Longitudinal Data: With Applications in Biostatistics
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Estimation and Inference for Quantile Regression of Longitudinal Data: With Applications in Biostatistics
2006 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis consists of four papers dealing with estimation and inference for quantile regression of longitudinal data, with an emphasis on nonlinear models.

The first paper extends the idea of quantile regression estimation from the case of cross-sectional data with independent errors to the case of linear or nonlinear longitudinal data with dependent errors, using a weighted estimator. The performance of different weights is evaluated, and a comparison is also made with the corresponding mean regression estimator using the same weights.

The second paper examines the use of bootstrapping for bias correction and calculations of confidence intervals for parameters of the quantile regression estimator when longitudinal data are used. Different weights, bootstrap methods, and confidence interval methods are used.

The third paper is devoted to evaluating bootstrap methods for constructing hypothesis tests for parameters of the quantile regression estimator using longitudinal data. The focus is on testing the equality between two groups of one or all of the parameters in a regression model for some quantile using single or joint restrictions. The tests are evaluated regarding both their significance level and their power.

The fourth paper analyzes seven longitudinal data sets from different parts of the biostatistics area by quantile regression methods in order to demonstrate how new insights can emerge on the properties of longitudinal data from using quantile regression methods. The quantile regression estimates are also compared and contrasted with the least squares mean regression estimates for the same data set. In addition to looking at the estimates, confidence intervals and hypothesis testing procedures are examined.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2006. p. 36
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences, ISSN 1652-9030 ; 18
Keywords
Statistics, Bias correction, Bootstrap, Dependent errors, Hypothesis testing, Nonlinear model, Simulation study, Statistik
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7186 (URN)91-554-6678-8 (ISBN)
Public defence
2006-11-10, Hörsal 2, Ekonomikum, Kyrkogårdsgatan 10, Uppsala, 13:15
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2006-10-19 Created: 2006-10-19 Last updated: 2013-06-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Karlsson, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karlsson, Andreas
By organisation
Centre for Clinical Research, County of Västmanland
In the same journal
Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
Computer and Information Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 548 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf