uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Genmodifierade livsmedel och kommunikativ etik: En analys av etisk oenighet i debatten om genmodifierade livsmedel
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Theology, Department of Theology, Ethics and Philosophy of Religion.
2005 (Swedish)Licentiate thesis, monograph (Other academic)Alternative title
Genetically Modified Food and Communicative Ethics : An analysis of ethical conflicts in the novel food debate (English)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this thesis is to analyse the Swedish debate regarding genetically modified food products. What does the moral disagreements within this debate entail? In which way would it be possible to obtain and maintain a true dialogue? Is consensus a plausible or even a desirable goal? Can communicative ethics contribute? These questions are analysed in this research project.

The project focuses on three themes of the debate on genetically modified food 1990-2000 in Sweden. The first theme is in relation to the concepts: natural and unnatural. Within the debate on genetically modified food, there have been various wide ranging arguments on whether or not genetic modification is natural or unnatural.

The second theme concerns the concepts of risk and benefit. Safety questions and possible risks and benefits have been subjects of discussion and debate for a long time. This analysis highlights the way risks or benefits are valued. What does it mean if something is a risk?

The third theme concerns the argumentations regarding democracy, mostlyin relation to labelling discussions. Democracy is used to describe freedom of choice, another argumentation focuses on the right to be a part of the decision making process.

The last part of the thesis discusses the question whether communicative ethics can contribute to obtain dialogue between various parties, and whether consensus is possible or even a desirable as a goal. How would this function in a debate where there is an ethical disagreement based on divergent ethical standpoints?

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Etik och Religionsfilosofi , 2005. , p. 106
Keywords [en]
Ethics, Communicative Ethics, Seyla Benhabib, Argumentation analysis, Genetically modified food, Novel food, Consensus, Dialogue
Keywords [sv]
Etik
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-6228ISBN: 91-506-1837-7 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-6228DiVA, id: diva2:173397
Presentation
2005-12-20, , Universitetshuset, Uppsala, 13:15
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2005-12-05 Created: 2005-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(426 kB)2096 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 426 kBChecksum MD5
e0f20419f1de248bc50e731b3d66785c92cb6f54b77c61cb3cba4725d19e07450c83838d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Ethics and Philosophy of Religion
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2096 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1422 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf