Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Public Policy Exception and Arbitrability Defence under the New York Convention 1958: A study of public policy and arbitrability, including empirical evidence of national court decisions
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Description
Abstract [en]

This thesis investigates the public policy exception and arbitrability defence under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (“New York Convention 1958”) in international commercial arbitration. It examines the varied notions of public policy, including domestic/national, international, and transnational public policy, and scrutinises the nuances of the arbitrability concept, noting a distinct approach in the U.S. The study also investigates the relationship between public policy and arbitrability.  

The New York Convention 1958 advocates a pro–enforcement policy, urging its Member States to interpret and apply the limited grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards restrictively. Over time, this pro–enforcement approach has evolved into a consensus, yet there is a lack of empirical evidence substantiating this widely held view. The study seeks evidence-based law insights on the consensus.

The research comprises three steps: first, examining the general notions of public policy and arbitrability. Second, analysis of specific provisions of the New York Convention 1958 related to public policy and arbitrability, along with the UNCITRAL Model Law’s role in attempting to shape Member States’ arbitration legislations. It highlights the very great diversity of interpretation and applications by different Member States due to their varied legal, cultural, and economic backgrounds. Last, investigation of the enforcement friendly stance, through a quantitative study of national court decisions. It analyses the frequency and success rates of the public policy and arbitrability defences. The findings suggest, contrary to the conclusion one would reach from a study limited to the diversity of interpretation and application noted above, that there is in fact a strong pro–enforcement approach, with only 11% of cases successfully invoking the public policy or inarbitrability defences in challenged proceedings.

This study brings to the surface the unexpectedly strong influence of the New York Convention 1958 and the Model Law in achieving consensus despite the diversity highlighted. It contributes to the understanding of public policy and arbitrability as concepts as well as defences, underscoring their application in different legal contexts and providing empirical evidence on the pro–enforcement spirit. The study’s insights offer suggestions for future research and legislative development in this field.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Department of Law, Uppsala University , 2024. , p. 365
Keywords [en]
International Commercial Arbitration, New York Convention 1958, UNCITRAL Model Law, Public Policy Exception, Arbitrability Defence, Jurisdictional Issues, Domestic Public Policy, International Public Policy, Transnational Public Policy, Pro-Enforcement Approach Consensus, Empirical Study
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-519816ISBN: 978-91-506-3034-3 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-519816DiVA, id: diva2:1825599
Public defence
2024-03-01, Uppsala University Sal IX, Uppsala, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-02-09 Created: 2024-01-09 Last updated: 2024-02-09

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bùi, Victoria
By organisation
Department of Law
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1412 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf