uu.seUppsala universitets publikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Different perspectives on communication quality and emotional functioning during routine oncology consultations
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Farmaceutiska fakulteten, Institutionen för farmaci.
Uppsala universitet, Universitetsförvaltningen, Planeringsavdelningen. Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Farmaceutiska fakulteten, Institutionen för farmaci.
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Farmaceutiska fakulteten, Institutionen för farmaci.
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för radiologi, onkologi och strålningsvetenskap, Enheten för onkologi.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2012 (engelsk)Inngår i: Patient Education and Counseling, ISSN 0738-3991, E-ISSN 1873-5134, Vol. 88, nr 1, s. 16-22Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To determine quality of communication in routine oncology consultations from patient, physician, and observer perspectives, and to determine agreement of emotional function content in consultations from these three perspectives.

Methods: In total, 69 consultations were included. Perceived quality of communication and whether or not emotional functioning had been discussed was evaluated with patient- and physician-reported questionnaires. Observer perspective was evaluated by content analysis of audio records of the consultations. Agreement between perspectives was analyzed and means compared using linear mixed models.

Results: The patients' ratings of communication quality differed significantly from those of both the physician and observer. Observer and physician scores did not differ significantly. Physicians rated emotional functioning as discussed more often than was reported from patient and observer perspectives.

Conclusion: The patients' view of the quality of communication differed from that of the physician and observer. Whether emotional functioning was discussed or not was also perceived differently by patients, physicians, and observer.

Practice implications: The underpinnings and implications of these results need to be further explored regarding how to move toward a higher degree of shared understanding, where different perspectives are more in alignment, and how to develop more valid methods for evaluating communication.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2012. Vol. 88, nr 1, s. 16-22
Emneord [en]
Oncology, Communication, Content analysis, Emotional functioning, Communication analysis, Clinical practice
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-179580DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.12.002ISI: 000306541300004OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-179580DiVA, id: diva2:545380
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-08-20 Laget: 2012-08-20 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-07bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Patient-Physician Communication in Oncology Care: The character of, barriers against, and ways to evaluate patient-physician communication, with focus on the psychosocial dimensions
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Patient-Physician Communication in Oncology Care: The character of, barriers against, and ways to evaluate patient-physician communication, with focus on the psychosocial dimensions
2012 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis was to characterize patient-physician communication in oncology care with focus on the content and quality of the consultations from the perspectives of patients, oncologists and observer. Further, the aim was to explore oncologists’ perceived barriers against psychosocial communication in out-patient consultations. Finally, the aim was to evaluate different methods for evaluating communication in this setting.

Routine oncology out-patient consultations from two different hospitals were audio-recorded. After the consultations, patients and oncologists perceptions of the content and quality of the communication were assessed using a self-report questionnaire. A nation-wide survey was performed to assess oncologists’ perceived barriers against psychosocial communication. Finally, the audio-recorded consultations were used for evaluating inter-rater reliability and feasibility of two different communication analysis instruments.

Patient-physician consultations in oncology care are focused on the physical aspects of disease and treatment, both in terms of how often these issues were discussed and in terms of the amount of time spent on discussing them. Psychosocial issues, such as the disease’s effects on patients’ emotional or social functioning, are not always discussed during consultations, and the time spent on such discussions is limited. When psychosocial issues are discussed during the medical consultations, they are most often patient-initiated. Reasons for why psychosocial aspects are seldom discussed during the medical consultations can be the barriers concerning this kind of communication perceived by a large majority (93%) of the oncologists. Barriers against psychosocial communication were identified at organizational levels (including guidelines, routines, and resources) and individual levels (including physicians’ knowledge and attitudes).

Furthermore, this thesis shows that there are methods with high feasibility and reliability for evaluating the content of patient-physician communication, in large study samples in oncology care. The method (observation/self-report) and perspective (patient, physician, and observer) used when evaluating communication affects the results. This needs to be considered when choosing evaluation methods in intervention studies.

There are reasons to continue to evaluate, promote and implement promising ways of achieving better communication in clinical practice. Research should focus on how to overcome barriers against psychosocial communication.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2012. s. 91
Serie
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Pharmacy, ISSN 1651-6192 ; 167
Emneord
patient-physician communication, barriers, psychosocial, content analysis systems, clinical practice, communication
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Samhällsfarmaci
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-183841 (URN)978-91-554-8543-6 (ISBN)
Disputas
2012-12-21, Auditorium Minus, Museum Gustavianum, Akademigatan 3, Uppsala, 09:15 (svensk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-11-28 Laget: 2012-11-03 Sist oppdatert: 2018-01-12bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Fagerlind, HannaKettis, ÅsaBergström, IdaGlimelius, BengtRing, Lena

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Fagerlind, HannaKettis, ÅsaBergström, IdaGlimelius, BengtRing, Lena
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Patient Education and Counseling

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 819 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf