uu.seUppsala universitets publikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effect of e-learning program on risk assessment and pressure ulcer classification: A randomized study
Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, N-0450 Oslo, Norway..
Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, N-0450 Oslo, Norway..
Uppsala universitet, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, Medicinska fakulteten, Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap, Vårdvetenskap.
Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, N-0316 Oslo, Norway..
2016 (engelsk)Inngår i: Nurse Education Today, ISSN 0260-6917, E-ISSN 1532-2793, Vol. 40, s. 191-197Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Resurstyp
Text
Abstract [en]

Background: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are a problem in health care. Staff competency is paramount to PU prevention. Education is essential to increase skills in pressure ulcer classification and risk assessment. Currently, no pressure ulcer learning programs are available in Norwegian. Objectives: Develop and test an e-learning program for assessment of pressure ulcer risk and pressure ulcer classification. Methods: Design, participants and setting: Forty-four nurses working in acute care hospital wards or nursing homes participated and were assigned randomly into two groups: an e-learning program group (intervention) and a traditional classroom lecture group (control). Data was collected immediately before and after training, and again after three months. The study was conducted at one nursing home and two hospitals between May and December 2012. Analysis: Accuracy of risk assessment (five patient cases) and pressure ulcer classification (40 photos [normal skin, pressure ulcer categories I-IV] split in two sets) were measured by comparing nurse evaluations in each of the two groups to a pre-established standard based on ratings by experts in pressure ulcer classification and risk assessment. Inter-rater reliability was measured by exact percent agreement and multi-rater Fleiss kappa. A Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous sum score variables. Results: An e-learning program did not improve Braden subscale scoring. For pressure ulcer classification, however, the intervention group scored significantly higher than the control group on several of the categories in post-test immediately after training. However, after three months there were no significant differences in classification skills between the groups. Conclusion: An e-learning program appears to have a greater effect on the accuracy of pressure ulcer classification than classroom teaching in the short term. For proficiency in Braden scoring, no significant effect of educational methods on learning results was detected.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2016. Vol. 40, s. 191-197
Emneord [en]
E-leaming, Classroom learning, Braden scale, Pressure ulcer classification
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-298244DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.008ISI: 000376051200031PubMedID: 27125172OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-298244DiVA, id: diva2:945552
Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-07-01 Laget: 2016-07-01 Sist oppdatert: 2017-11-28bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Personposter BETA

Gunningberg, Lena

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Gunningberg, Lena
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Nurse Education Today

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 394 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf