uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Adverse effects and benefits of two years of anagrelide treatment for thrombocythemia in chronic myeloproliferative disorders
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences. (Hematologi)
Show others and affiliations
2004 (English)In: Haematologica, ISSN 0390-6078, E-ISSN 1592-8721, Vol. 89, no 5, 520-527 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although anagrelide is widely used in the treatment of thrombocythemia in myeloproliferative diseases, there is currently limited information on the efficacy and toxicity of its long-term use. This prospective study investigated clinical toxicity and efficacy of anagrelide during two years of treatment.

DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter, open, phase II study of anagrelide treatment was performed by the Swedish Myeloproliferative Disorder Study Group. The study included 60 patients with thrombocythemia due to myeloproliferative disease, 42 with essential thrombocythemia (ET), 17 with polycythemia vera (PV) and one with myelofibrosis (MF).

RESULTS: Complete response (CR), defined as a platelet count <400x10(9)/L in symptomatic patients and < 600x10(9)/L in asymptomatic patients was achieved in 67% of the patients and partial response (PR) in 6%. The response rate was higher in patients with ET than in those with PV (p = 0.05). Primary treatment failure occurred in 27% due to lack of efficacy at a tolerable dose (n=13) or insufficient platelet response without side effects (n=3). In addition, another 14 patients withdrew from treatment before the end of the two-year period due to side effects. Side effects included palpitations (70%), headache (52%), nausea (35%), diarrhea or flatulence (33%), edema (22%) and fatigue (23%). Patients and doctors rated their satisfaction with the anagrelide treatment on a 10-grade scale from 7.6 at 3 months to >9 at 24 months. After two years, 50% (n=30) of the patients continued anagrelide treatment.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Side effects and toxic discontinuation rates were higher than in previous studies, probably because this is the first long-term prospective study of the feasibility and toxicity of anagrelide treatment. Nevertheless, anagrelide is a valuable alternative for treatment of thrombocythemia in myeloproliferative disorders for patients who tolerate the drug well.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 89, no 5, 520-527 p.
Keyword [en]
thrombocythemia, anagrelide, myeloproliferative disease
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-73073PubMedID: 15136214OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-73073DiVA: diva2:100984
Available from: 2006-05-15 Created: 2006-05-15 Last updated: 2010-12-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

By organisation
Department of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 141 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link