uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Long-Term Outcome After Carotid Artery Stenting: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study
Karolinska Inst, Sodersjukhuset, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, Stockholm, Sweden.;Soder Sjukhuset, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden..
Karolinska Inst, Inst Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden.;Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Stockholm, Sweden..
Karolinska Inst, Sodersjukhuset, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, Stockholm, Sweden.;Soder Sjukhuset, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Stroke, ISSN 0039-2499, E-ISSN 1524-4628, Vol. 47, no 8, 2083-2089 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and Purpose-Long-term outcome after carotid artery stenting (CAS), a less invasive technique than carotid endarterectomy (CEA), for prevention of stroke, is unclear. The aim was to assess long-term outcomes after CAS, compared with CEA, in a nationwide cohort study.

Methods-All patients registered in the national Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc) treated with primary CAS between 2005 and 2012 were identified. For every CAS, 2 CEA controls, matched for sex, age, procedure year, and indication (symtomatic/asymtomatic), were chosen. Postoperative stroke was identified by cross-matching the cohort with the InPatient Registry and charts review. Primary end point was ipsilateral stroke or death >30 days postoperatively.

Results-A total of 1157 patients were included, 409 CAS and 748 CEA; 73% men with mean age 70 years and 69% were symptomatic. Risk factor profile was similar between the 2 groups. Median follow-up time was 4.1 years. Ipsilateral stroke or death of >30 days postoperatively occurred in 95 of 394 in the CAS group versus 120 of 724 in the CEA group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.18). The corresponding adjusted rates for death, ipsilateral stroke of >30 days, and any stroke or death of >30 days were 25.7% versus 18.6% (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.72), 9.4% versus 2.9% (hazard ratio, 3.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-7.53), 34.2% versus 23.6% (hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.00) for the CAS group versus CEA group, respectively.

Conclusions-In this nationwide cohort study, CAS was associated with an increased long-term risk of ipsilateral stroke and death during after the perioperative phase when compared with CEA.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 47, no 8, 2083-2089 p.
Keyword [en]
carotid artery, common, cohort studies, endarterectomy, carotid, stenting, stroke
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-303117DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013018ISI: 000380808400029PubMedID: 27406106OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-303117DiVA: diva2:1033015
Available from: 2016-10-05 Created: 2016-09-15 Last updated: 2016-10-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wanhainen, Anders
By organisation
Vascular Surgery
In the same journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link