uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative analysis of nutrition data from national, household, and individual levels: results from a WHO-CINDI collaborative project in Canada, Finland, Poland, and Spain
Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; Community Nutrition Research Centre, Science Park of the University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhovile University, Canada.
Community Nutrition Research Centre, Science Park of the University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Bureau of Nutritional Sciences, Food Directorate, Ottawa, Canada.
Show others and affiliations
2003 (English)In: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, ISSN 0143-005X, E-ISSN 1470-2738, Vol. 57, no 1, 74-80 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This project determined to what extent data on diet and nutrition, which were collected in a non-uniform manner, could be harmonised and pooled for international and national comparison.

DESIGN: Direct comparisons of dietary data between studies were made using food balance sheets (FBS), household budget surveys (HBS), and individual dietary data (IDS); comparisons were also made within countries. Differences in study design and methodological approaches were taken into consideration. Data from research projects from the following four World Health Organisation (WHO) Countrywide Integrated Noncommunicable Disease Intervention (CINDI) countries were included-Canada, Finland, Poland, and Spain.

MAIN RESULTS: FBS overestimated food consumption and nutrient intake compared to IDS. Results between HBS and IDS were quite similar, except for fish, meat, pulses and vegetables, which were underestimated by HBS, and sugar and honey and cereals, which were overestimated. Percentages of energy from fat, carbohydrates and proteins were higher when estimated from FBS, HBS, and IDS respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that estimations from these three sources of dietary data are difficult to compare because they are measuring different levels of dietary information. The understanding of their relations may be important in formulating and evaluating a nutrition policy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2003. Vol. 57, no 1, 74-80 p.
Keyword [en]
diet; disease prevalence; international comparison; nutrition
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Research subject
Epidemiology; Culinary Arts and Meal Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-304942DOI: 10.1136/jech.57.1.74ISI: 000180078500018PubMedID: 12490653Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0037218962OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-304942DiVA: diva2:1034319
Available from: 2015-01-11 Created: 2016-10-11 Last updated: 2017-11-29

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Yngve, Agneta
In the same journal
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 327 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf