uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Beam modeling and verification of a photon beam multisource model.
Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology. Onkologi. (Medicinsk strålfysik)
Show others and affiliations
2005 (English)In: Medical Physics, ISSN 0094-2405, Vol. 32, no 6, 1722-37 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Dose calculations for treatment planning of photon beam radiotherapy require a model of the beam to drive the dose calculation models. The beam shaping process involves scattering and filtering that yield radiation components which vary with collimator settings. The necessity to model these components has motivated the development of multisource beam models. We describe and evaluate clinical photon beam modeling based on multisource models, including lateral beam quality variations. The evaluation is based on user data for a pencil kernel algorithm and a point kernel algorithm (collapsed cone) used in the clinical treatment planning systems Helax-TMS and Nucletron-Oncentra. The pencil kernel implementations treat the beam spectrum as lateral invariant while the collapsed cone involves off axis softening of the spectrum. Both algorithms include modeling of head scatter components. The parameters of the beam model are derived from measured beam data in a semiautomatic process called RDH (radiation data handling) that, in sequential steps, minimizes the deviations in calculated dose versus the measured data. The RDH procedure is reviewed and the results of processing data from a large number of treatment units are analyzed for the two dose calculation algorithms. The results for both algorithms are similar, with slightly better results for the collapsed cone implementations. For open beams, 87% of the machines have maximum errors less than 2.5%. For wedged beams the errors were found to increase with increasing wedge angle. Internal, motorized wedges did yield slightly larger errors than external wedges. These results reflect the increased complexity, both experimentally and computationally, when wedges are used compared to open beams.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 32, no 6, 1722-37 p.
Keyword [en]
Algorithms, Calibration, Computer Simulation, Film Dosimetry, Models; Statistical, Models; Theoretical, Particle Accelerators, Phantoms; Imaging, Photons, Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning; Computer-Assisted/instrumentation/*methods, Radiotherapy; Computer-Assisted/*methods, Radiotherapy; Conformal/instrumentation/*methods, Radiotherapy; High-Energy/instrumentation/*methods, Scattering; Radiation
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-75633PubMedID: 16013730OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-75633DiVA: diva2:103544
Available from: 2006-05-03 Created: 2006-05-03 Last updated: 2011-01-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links


Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ahnesjö, Anders
By organisation
Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 331 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link