uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Why Neuroscientific Expalantions of Religious Experiences are not Free from Cultural Aspects: Why Neuroscientific Expalantions of Religious Experiences are not Free from Cultural Aspects
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Theology, Department of Theology. Religionsfilosofi. (Science and Religion)
2006 (English)In: Ars DisputandiArticle in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We cannot disregard that the neuroscientific research on religious phenomena such as religious exepriences and rituals for example, has increased significantly the last years. Neuroscientists claim that neuroscience contributes considerably in the process of understanding religious experiences, because neuroscience is able to measure brain activity during religious experiences by way of brain-imaging technologies. No doubt that results of neuroscientific research on religious experiences are an important supplement to the understanding of some types of religious experiences. However, some conclusions drawn from neuroscientific research on religious experiences are arguable. For example, one such conclusion is that religious experiences are actually nothing but neural activity, i.e. there is nothing "religious" to the experiences at all. Another such conclusion is that a person's religious experiences actually derive from ultimate reality, meaning that religious experiences are real. It is the latter assertion that will be analyzed in the present paper. The question is asked whether neuroscience alone is able to affirm that religious experiences are real or whether there are, besides neuroscientific issues, also cultural-religious assumptions that underlie this conclusion.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006.
Keyword [en]
Culture, Neuroscience, Religious Experience, Meditation
National Category
Religious Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-76507OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-76507DiVA: diva2:104419
Note
Submitted dec. 2005 to Ars DisputandiAvailable from: 2006-11-27 Created: 2006-11-27 Last updated: 2011-01-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Theology
Religious Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 517 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf