uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cosmopolitanism And Populism: From Incompatibility To Convergence, And Back
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Theology, Department of Theology. Univ Rijeka, Ctr Adv Studies, Polit Philosophy, Rijeka, Croatia.;Inst Wissensch Menschen, Vienna, Austria.;Univ Groningen, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands.;Univ Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, England.;Palacky Univ, Olomouc, Czech Republic..
2016 (English)In: ANALELE UNIVERSITATII BUCURESTI-STIINTE POLITICE, ISSN 1582-2486, Vol. 18, no 1, 83-102 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Cosmopolitanism and populism are opposing concepts: populism usually sees persons as embedded in national or ethnic communities, while the core idea shared by all cosmopolitan views is that all human beings belong to a single community and the ultimate units of moral concern are individual human beings, not particular forms of human associations. However, the paradigm of conceiving both cosmopolitanism and populism is changing. Authors discover the promise and relevance of populism, while within the political theory of cosmopolitanism there are calls towards 'roots', as in the concept of rooted or vernacular cosmopolitanisms. In this new theoretical context, the incompatibility between populism and cosmopolitanism is weakening, points of convergence between two concepts start becoming visible. This paper examines the confluences between populism and cosmopolitanism, and assesses the limits of this convergence. Thus, the first section of the paper examines the main features of populism, seen mostly from the perspective of populism as a pathology. The second section examines the proposals to see populism as part of emancipatory politics, showing that this perspective of conceiving populism is compatible with cosmopolitanism. The third section identifies the populist emancipatory elements in a cosmopolitan discourse and action, while the fourth section examines the possible criticism of cosmopolitan populism, pointing that most of the criticism of populism in the state context is not valid for populism in a cosmopolitan context. The conclusion shows that a cosmopolitan populism is not part of a vision of cosmopolitanism as eternal peace and global consensus, but of a contestatory and agonistic cosmopolitanism.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 18, no 1, 83-102 p.
Keyword [en]
cosmopolitanism, populism, emancipatory politics, global protests
National Category
History
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-308008ISI: 000383907800004OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-308008DiVA: diva2:1049055
Available from: 2016-11-23 Created: 2016-11-23 Last updated: 2016-11-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Fulltext
By organisation
Department of Theology
History

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 5 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link