uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implications of molecular systematic analyses on the conservation of rare and threatened taxa: contrasting examples from Malvaceae
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Biology, Department of Evolution, Genomics and Systematics, Systematic Botany. Systematisk botanik.
2005 (English)In: Conservation Genetics, ISSN 1566-0621, E-ISSN 1572-9737, Vol. 6, no 3, 399-412 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Systematic research provides essential evidence for setting conservation priorities for rare and endangered taxa. Phylogenetic analyses can identify cryptic, genetically distinct lineages as well as actively interbreeding, and hence, non-distinctive lineages earlier perceived as separate taxa. A major aim of this study was to identify genetically distinct, rare lineages within two Malvaceae sister-genera, Sidalcea and Eremalche. The focus was two taxon-pairs each consisting of one rare and one more common taxon. The results demonstrate that even within two closely related genera, with a large number of rare taxa, molecular phylogenetic analyses can reveal contrasting degrees of evolutionary divergence and thus contrasting conservation implications for threatened taxa. Contrary to expectations, the substitution rate in the nuclear ribosomal transcribed spacers for annualEremalche did not correspond to the faster evolutionary rate of annuals – compared to perennials – detected earlier within Sidalcea. Branch lengths in the (annual) Eremalche clade were shorter than those of annual members of Sidalcea. The phylogenetic analyses showed that the rare and endangered S. keckii and E. kernensis each are most closely related to a common species that has been regarded as insufficiently distinct to warrant separate taxonomic status. An additional aim of the study was to test the utility of the Phylogenetic Diversity (PD) measure to formalize the procedure of prioritizing conservation efforts. The measure demonstrated S. keckii (but not E. kernensis) to be genetically distinct from its closest relative and a good candidate for conservation. The PD measure was earlier used for assessing conservation priorities for areas, but proved useful to more objectively suggest conservation priorities among threatened taxa. Because this measure is calculated directly from the data, it retains more character information and gives a better representation of genetic diversity than other measures relying on tree topologies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 6, no 3, 399-412 p.
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-77150DOI: 10.1007/s10592-005-4977-zOAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-77150DiVA: diva2:105062
Available from: 2006-07-04 Created: 2006-07-04 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Andreasen, Katarina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andreasen, Katarina
By organisation
Systematic Botany
In the same journal
Conservation Genetics
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 639 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf