Effectiveness of enamel matrix derivative on the clinical and microbiological outcomes following surgical regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis. A randomized controlled trial
2016 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, ISSN 0303-6979, E-ISSN 1600-051X, Vol. 43, no 10, 863-873 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, Centre for Research and Development, Gävleborg. Umea Univ, Dept Odontol Mol Periodontol, Umea, Sweden.; Gavle Cty Hosp, Dept Periodontol, Gavle, Sweden.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, Centre for Research and Development, Gävleborg. Gavle Cty Hosp, Dept Periodontol, Gavle, Sweden.
Kristianstad Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Kristianstad, Sweden.;Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Dent Sci, Dublin, Ireland.;Blekinge Inst Technol, Karlskrona, Sweden..
Postgrad Dent Educ Ctr, Dept Oral Radiol, Orebro, Sweden.;Univ Orebro, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Fac Med & Hlth, Orebro, Sweden..
Objective: This randomized clinical trial aimed at comparing radiological, clinical and microbial effects of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis alone or in combination with enamel matrix derivative (EMD).
Methods: Twenty-six subjects were treated with open flap debridement and decontamination of the implant surfaces with gauze and saline preceding adjunctive EMD or no EMD. Bone level (BL) change was primary outcome and secondary outcomes were changes in pocket depth (PD), plaque, pus, bleeding and the microbiota of the peri-implant biofilm analyzed by the Human Oral Microbe Identification Microarray over a time period of 12 months.
Results: In multivariate modelling, increased marginal BL at implant site was significantly associated with EMD, the number of osseous walls in the peri-implant bone defect and a Gram+/aerobic microbial flora, whereas reduced BL was associated with a Gram-/anaerobic microbial flora and presence of bleeding and pus, with a cross-validated predictive capacity (Q(2)) of 36.4%. Similar, but statistically non-significant, trends were seen for BL, PD, plaque, pus and bleeding in univariate analysis.
Conclusion: Adjunctive EMD to surgical treatment of peri-implantitis was associated with prevalence of Gram+/aerobic bacteria during the follow-up period and increased marginal BL 12 months after treatment.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 43, no 10, 863-873 p.
bone level, EMD treatment, microbiota, peri-implantitis
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-311228DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12583ISI: 000388357000008PubMedID: 27418458OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-311228DiVA: diva2:1059640