uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Self reported fear of childbirth and its association with women's birth experience and mode of delivery: a longitudinal population-based study.
Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Health Science, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Department of Health Science, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
2012 (English)In: Women and Birth, ISSN 1871-5192, E-ISSN 1878-1799, Vol. 25, no 3Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To explore fear of childbirth (FOC) during pregnancy and one year after birth and its association to birth experience and mode of delivery.

DESIGN: A longitudinal population-based study.

POPULATION: Pregnant women who were listed for a routine ultrasound at three hospitals in the middle-north part of Sweden.

METHOD: Differences between women who reported FOC and who did not were calculated using risk ratios with a 95% confidence interval. In order to explain which factors were most strongly associated to suffer from FOC during pregnancy and one year after childbirth, multivariate logistic regression analyses were used.

RESULTS: FOC during pregnancy in multiparous women was associated with a previous negative birth experience (RR 5.1, CI 2.5-10.4) and a previous emergency caesarean section (RR 2.5, CI 1.2-5.4). Associated factors for FOC one year after childbirth were: a negative birth experience (RR 10.3, CI 5.1-20.7), fear of childbirth during pregnancy (RR 7.1, CI 4.4-11.7), emergency caesarean section (RR 2.4, CI 1.2-4.5) and primiparity (RR 1.9, CI 1.2-3.1).

CONCLUSION: FOC was associated with negative birth experiences. Women still perceived the birth experience as negative a year after the event. Women's perception of the overall birth experience as negative seems to be more important for explaining subsequent FOC than mode of delivery. Maternity care should focus on women's experiences of childbirth. Staff at antenatal clinics should ask multiparous women about their previous experience of childbirth. So that FOC is minimized, research on factors that create a positive birth experience for women is required.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 25, no 3
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-312169DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2011.06.001PubMedID: 21764400OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-312169DiVA: diva2:1062415
Available from: 2017-01-05 Created: 2017-01-05 Last updated: 2017-01-05

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hildingsson, Ingegerd
In the same journal
Women and Birth
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 140 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf