uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The donation process of living kidney donors
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research. (Health Services Research)
2005 (English)In: Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, ISSN 0931-0509, E-ISSN 1460-2385, Vol. 20, no 8, 1707-13 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background. The rates of both genetic and non-genetic living donors are increasing. However, previous research has almost exclusively explored the decision-making of genetic donors. Therefore, in this study both genetic and non-genetic donors are investigated with focus on their whole donation process.

Methods. Thirty-nine donors were interviewed the day before nephrectomy and 3 weeks afterwards. Twenty-three donors were genetic relatives, 16 were not. The interviews were analysed qualitatively, mainly by narrative structuring.

Results. All donors but one passed seven steps in the donation process. They included: (i) awareness of suffering; compassion and empathy; (ii) imminence of transplantation; recognition of oneself as potential donor; (iii) information acquisition and deliberation; (iv) attribution of responsibility to oneself; announcement of decision to donate; (v) examination; maintaining the decision; (vi) facing nephrectomy; and (vii) postoperative experiences. Two types of decision-making were displayed: immediate and later announcement of decision. Half the donors belonged to each type. Various relationship groups displayed different types. The examination period was the most stressful time, partly due to imperfect coordination and excessive time-wasting. One-third found postoperative pain the most painful experience ever. There was a lack of attention to regressive needs and to recognition of the deed.

Conclusions. The two types of decision-making seem similar in ethical requirements. It is not a genetic or non-genetic relationship per se that determines what kind of decision the donors make. Psychological support, especially during Steps 5 and 7, should be improved and the donors included in a structured donation programme. Possible health care ambivalence toward living donation should not affect the donors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 20, no 8, 1707-13 p.
Keyword [en]
Adaptation; Psychological, Adult, Attitude to Health, Decision Making, Female, Health Status, Humans, Kidney, Kidney Transplantation/*psychology, Living Donors/*psychology, Male, Middle Aged, Nephrectomy, Research Support; Non-U.S. Gov't, Sweden
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-78789DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfh861PubMedID: 15855199OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-78789DiVA: diva2:106702
Available from: 2006-03-30 Created: 2006-03-30 Last updated: 2010-05-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=15855199&dopt=Citation

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sanner, Margareta A.
By organisation
Health Services Research
In the same journal
Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 204 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link