uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gender (in)equality among employees in elder care: implications for health
Umeå universitet, Allmänmedicin.
Umeå universitet, Institutionen för omvårdnad.
Umeå universitet, Allmänmedicin.
2012 (English)In: International Journal for Equity in Health, ISSN 1475-9276, E-ISSN 1475-9276, Vol. 11, no 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Gendered practices of working life create gender inequalities through horizontal and vertical gender segregation in work, which may lead to inequalities in health between women and men. Gender equality could therefore be a key element of health equity in working life. Our aim was to analyze what gender (in) equality means for the employees at a woman-dominated workplace and discuss possible implications for health experiences.

Methods: All caregiving staff at two workplaces in elder care within a municipality in the north of Sweden were invited to participate in the study. Forty-five employees participated, 38 women and 7 men. Seven focus group discussions were performed and led by a moderator. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the focus groups.

Results: We identified two themes. "Advocating gender equality in principle" showed how gender (in) equality was seen as a structural issue not connected to the individual health experiences. "Justifying inequality with individualism" showed how the caregivers focused on personalities and interests as a justification of gender inequalities in work division. The justification of gender inequality resulted in a gendered work division which may be related to health inequalities between women and men. Gender inequalities in work division were primarily understood in terms of personality and interests and not in terms of gender.

Conclusion: The health experience of the participants was affected by gender (in) equality in terms of a gendered work division. However, the participants did not see the gendered work division as a gender equality issue. Gender perspectives are needed to improve the health of the employees at the workplaces through shifting from individual to structural solutions. A healthy-setting approach considering gender relations is needed to achieve gender equality and fairness in health status between women and men.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central , 2012. Vol. 11, no 1
Keyword [en]
Content analysis, focus groups, gender, health experiences, work environment, workplace
National Category
Family Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-309143DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-1ISI: 000300877300001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-309143DiVA: diva2:1077092
Available from: 2017-02-24 Created: 2017-02-24 Last updated: 2017-02-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textFulltext

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hammarström, Anne
In the same journal
International Journal for Equity in Health
Family Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 119 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf