uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Predicting appendicular lean and fat mass with bioelectrical impedance analysis in older adults with physical function decline: The PROVIDE study
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Clinical Nutrition, ISSN 0261-5614, E-ISSN 1532-1983, Vol. 36, no 3, 869-875 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background & aims: No generalizable formulas exist that are derived from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for predicting appendicular lean mass (ALM) and fat mass (AFM) in sarcopenic older adults. Since precision of regional body composition (BC) data in multicentre trials is essential, this study aimed to: 1) develop and cross-validate soft tissue BIA equations with GE Lunar and Hologic DXA systems as their reference 2) to compare our new ALM equation to two previously published models and 3) to assess the agreement between BIA- and DXA-derived soft tissue ratios as indicators of limb tissue quality.

Methods: Two-hundred and ninety-one participants with functional limitations (SPPB-score 4-9; sarcopenia class I or II, measured by BIA) were recruited from 18 study centres in six European countries. BIA equations, using DXA-derived ALM and AFM as the dependent variable, and age, gender, weight, impedance index and reactance as independent variables, were developed using a stepwise multiple linear regression approach.

Results: Cross-validation gave rise to 4 equations using the whole sample: ALMLUNAR (kg) = 1.821 + (0.168*height(2)/resistance) + (0.132*weight) + (0.017*reactance) - (1.931*sex) [R(2) = 0.86 and SEE = 1.37 kg] AFMLUNAR (kg) = -6.553 - (0.093* height(2)/resistance) + (0.272*weight) + (4.295*sex) [R(2) = 0.70 and SEE = 1.53 kg] ALMHOLOGIC (kg) = 4.957 + (0.196* height(2)/resistance) + (0.060*weight) - (2.554*sex) [R(2) = 0.90 and SEE = 1.28 kg] AFMHOLOGIC (kg) = -4.716 - (0.142* height(2)/resistance) + (0.316*weight) + (4.453*sex) - (0.040*reactance) [R(2) = 0.73 and SEE = 1.54 kg] Both previously published models significantly overestimated ALM in our sample with biases of -0.36 kg to -1.05 kg. For the ratio of ALM to AFM, a strong correlation (r = 0.82, P < 0.0001) was found between the mean estimate from BIA and the DXA models without significant difference (estimated bias of 0.02 and 95% LOA -0.62, 0.65).

Conclusion: We propose new BIA equations allowing the estimation of appendicular lean and fat mass. Our equations allow to accurately estimate the appendicular lean/fat ratio which might provide information regarding limb tissue quality, in clinical settings. Furthermore, these BIA equations can be applied to characterize sarcopenia with Hologic and Lunar reference values for BC. Previously published BIA-based models tend to overestimate ALM in sarcopenic older adults. Users of both GE Lunar and Hologic may now benefit from these equations in field research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 36, no 3, 869-875 p.
Keyword [en]
BIA, DXA, Older adults, Prediction, Sarcopenia, Soft tissue
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-317135DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.04.026ISI: 000401208700031PubMedID: 27178302OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-317135DiVA: diva2:1080574
Available from: 2017-03-10 Created: 2017-03-10 Last updated: 2017-06-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(653 kB)7 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 653 kBChecksum SHA-512
1a3e76b2328d97f8ea6235fb63be189ed28e1e4be007725fee2b5d671331b530aa2b6c92a0190fb6a1f35531b040d13698901a2a4b7fcbcbdb820edf1d961ecb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cederholm, Tommy
By organisation
Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
In the same journal
Clinical Nutrition
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 7 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 152 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf