uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
From role models to nations in need of advice: Norway and Sweden under the OECD’s magnifying glass
Högskolan i Gävle. (STEP)
University of Southeast Norway, Vestfold, Norway.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Education. (STEP)
2017 (English)In: Journal of education policy, ISSN 0268-0939, E-ISSN 1464-5106, Vol. 32, no 6, 721-744 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

By analysing five separate OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment practices with Norway and Sweden as cases, our study illustrates different ways in which a specific international educational reasoning is blended into more context-based national education policies and, as such, works in parallel with internal reforms and agendas. It is evident that an overarching narrative promotes the importance of coherent and integrated systems of evaluation and assessment in order to strengthen social and political endeavours for equity, quality and achievements. The parallel mix of OECD discourses and national discourses creates a combined narrative in which evaluations and assessments appear natural, self-evident and rational as well as highly adaptable to national settings. The study shows that national vertical and/or horizontal developments are intertwined with the OECD policy recommendations, which are quite general in character. In a continuing process of uploading and downloading, within different contexts, policies are elaborated and recontextualised. Evaluations and assessments are part of a contemporary rational paradigm for mapping and promoting performance in national educational systems - what we identify as a comparative curriculum code.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 32, no 6, 721-744 p.
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-317417DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2017.1301557ISI: 000407642500002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-317417DiVA: diva2:1081506
Available from: 2017-03-14 Created: 2017-03-14 Last updated: 2017-11-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Forsberg, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forsberg, Eva
By organisation
Department of Education
In the same journal
Journal of education policy
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 376 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf