uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A questionnaire measuring staff perceptions of Lean adoption in healthcare: development and psychometric testing
Univ Gavle, Fac Hlth & Occupat Studies, S-80176 Gavle, Sweden..
Univ Gavle, Fac Engn & Sustainable Dev, S-80176 Gavle, Sweden..
Univ Gavle, Fac Hlth & Occupat Studies, S-80176 Gavle, Sweden..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Caring Sciences. Univ Gavle, Fac Hlth & Occupat Studies, S-80176 Gavle, Sweden.; Lishui Univ, Dept Nursing, Med & Hlth Coll, Lishui Shi, Peoples R China..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9912-5350
2017 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, ISSN 1472-6963, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 17, no 1, 235Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: During the past decade, the concept of Lean has spread rapidly within the healthcare sector, but there is a lack of instruments that can measure staff's perceptions of Lean adoption. Thus, the aim of the present study was to develop a questionnaire measuring Lean in healthcare, based on Liker's description of Lean, by adapting an existing instrument developed for the service sector.

METHODS: A mixed-method design was used. Initially, items from the service sector instrument were categorized according to Liker's 14 principles describing Lean within four domains: philosophy, processes, people and partners and problem-solving. Items were lacking for three of Liker's principles and were therefore developed de novo. Think-aloud interviews were conducted with 12 healthcare staff from different professions to contextualize and examine the face validity of the questionnaire prototype. Thereafter, the adjusted questionnaire's psychometric properties were assessed on the basis of a cross-sectional survey among 386 staff working in primary care.

RESULTS: The think-aloud interviews led to adjustments in the questionnaire to better suit a healthcare context, and the number of items was reduced. Confirmatory factor analysis of the adjusted questionnaire showed a generally acceptable correspondence with Liker's description of Lean. Internal consistency, measured using Cronbach's alpha, for the factors in Liker's description of Lean was 0.60 for the factor people and partners, and over 0.70 for the three other factors. Test-retest reliability measured by the intra-class correlation coefficient ranged from 0.77 to 0.88 for the four factors.

CONCLUSIONS: We designed a questionnaire capturing staff's perceptions of Lean adoption in healthcare on the basis of Liker's description. This Lean in Healthcare Questionnaire (LiHcQ) showed generally acceptable psychometric properties, which supports its usability for measuring Lean adoption in healthcare. We suggest that further research focus on verifying the usability of LiHcQ in other healthcare settings, and on adjusting the instrument if needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 17, no 1, 235
Keyword [en]
Assessment instrument, Healthcare sector, Instrument development, Lean maturity, Performance measurement, Questionnaire validity, Reliability, Service sector, Survey instrument, Validity
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-319250DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2163-xISI: 000397166800002PubMedID: 28340573OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-319250DiVA: diva2:1086380
Available from: 2017-04-02 Created: 2017-04-02 Last updated: 2017-04-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1103 kB)41 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1103 kBChecksum SHA-512
7c8a0367e36cd3715fb9b196d2f16e5f351faddab4e80c00bf6cb4c8a650c2ac1d0de91ac08b705a324bdfa25eed032444f097dec0323cf141d446c21cddb0be
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Engström, Maria
By organisation
Caring Sciences
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 41 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 211 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf