uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Duplex ultrasound for identifying renal artery stenosis: direct criteria re-evaluated
Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Grona Straket 2, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden..
Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Mol & Clin Med, Nephrol, Gothenburg, Sweden..
Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Radiol, Copenhagen, Denmark.;Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Copenhagen, Denmark..
Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Grona Straket 2, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Acta Radiologica, ISSN 0284-1851, E-ISSN 1600-0455, Vol. 58, no 2, 176-182 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Renal artery duplex ultrasound (RADUS) is an established method for diagnosis of renal artery stenosis (RAS), but there is no consensus regarding optimal RADUS criteria. Purpose: To define optimal cutoff values for RADUS parameters when screening for RAS using intra-arterial transstenotic pressure gradient measurement (PGM) as reference. Material and Methods: The renal arteries of 58 consecutive patients evaluated for renovascular hypertension were examined by RADUS and PGM. Conclusive measurements with both methods were obtained in 76 arteries. Hemodynamically significant RAS was defined as PGM >= 15 mmHg and was found in 43 of the 76 arteries. RADUS parameters included renal artery peak systolic velocity (PSV) and the renal-aortic ratio (RAR) of flow velocities. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) and Youden's index were used to calculate optimal RADUS criteria for RAS. Results: When traditional RADUS criteria for RAS were used, with a combination of PSV >= 180 cm/s and RAR >= 3.5, the sensitivity was 62% and the specificity was 91%. When RADUS criteria were optimized for sensitivity, then RAR >= 2.6 alone resulted in a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 69%. Conclusion: The RAR >= 2.6 is a more sensitive criterion than traditional RADUS criteria when screening patients with clinical suspicion of RAS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD , 2017. Vol. 58, no 2, 176-182 p.
Keyword [en]
Vascular, Doppler ultrasound, arteries, kidney, hypertension
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-319570DOI: 10.1177/0284185116641345ISI: 000394268600007PubMedID: 27069093OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-319570DiVA: diva2:1087173
Available from: 2017-04-06 Created: 2017-04-06 Last updated: 2017-04-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eklöf, Hampus
By organisation
Radiology
In the same journal
Acta Radiologica
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 166 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf