uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
EU och civilrättens splittring: Exemplet preskription och ränta vid skadestånd
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies. (Handelsrätt)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2302-0392
2017 (Swedish)In: Tidsskrift for rettsvitenskap, ISSN 0040-7143, E-ISSN 1504-3096Article in journal (Refereed) Accepted
Abstract [sv]

Debatten om civilrättens splittring har accentuerats genom de nordiska ländernas inträde i EU respektive EES. I artikeln illustreras detta med de nya reglerna om preskription och ränta vid skadestånd på grund av en överträdelse av konkurrensrätten. Genom ett exempel visas hur den nya regleringen markant ökar det totala ersättningsbeloppet. Den nyligen införda särregleringen kritiseras eftersom den skapar en omotiverad olikabehandling av rättssystematiskt sett liknande situationer. Som alternativ föreslås en samlad egen reglering av preskription och ränta för fordringar om skadestånd, och en enhetlig behandling av de fall där den skadelidande svävar i okunskap om sin skada. Artikeln lämnar också vissa, om än allmänt hållna, förslag till hur vi i den nordiska rättsgemenskapen kan värna vår civilrätts konsekvens och systematik samtidigt som vi uppfyller våra EU-rättsliga eller EES-rättsliga skyldigheter.

Abstract [en]

Nordic debate on the fragmentation of private law has been accentuated through the entry of Nordic countries into the EU or EEA. In this article this is illustrated by reference to the new rules on limitation periods and interest on damages payable by reason of an infringement of competition law. Through an example it is shown how the new rules lead to a significant increase of the sum total of compensation payable. The newly introduced special rules are criticized as they create unmotivated differential treatment of systematically similar situations. As an alternative, it is suggested that a coherent set of rules on limitation and interest with regard to damages claims should be introduced, including uniform treatment of cases where the victim is unaware of the harm suffered. The article also includes some, albeit general, suggestions as to how the Nordic legal community should safeguard the consistency and systematic coherence of its private law while nevertheless fulfilling its obligations under EU and EEA law.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oslo, 2017.
Keyword [en]
EU law, private law, competition law, damages, limitation, interest
Keyword [sv]
EU-rätt, civilrätt, konkurrensrätt, skadestånd, preskription, ränta
National Category
Law
Research subject
European (Integration) Law; Civil Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-321448OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-321448DiVA: diva2:1093141
Available from: 2017-05-05 Created: 2017-05-05 Last updated: 2017-05-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Strand, Magnus
By organisation
Department of Business Studies
In the same journal
Tidsskrift for rettsvitenskap
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf