uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intrapartal care documented in a Swedish maternity unit and considered in relation to World Health Organization recommendations for care in normal birth
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health. (Obstetrisk forskning/Axelsson)
2006 (English)In: Midwifery, ISSN 0266-6138, E-ISSN 1532-3099, Vol. 22, no 3, 207-217 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: to describe documented intrapartal care in relation to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for care in normal birth, and to compare intrapartal care for pregnant women at low and high risk in a conventional maternity unit.

Design: retrospective examination of 212 consecutive childbirth records using an audit instrument developed from WHO's recommendations.

Setting: a conventional maternity unit in Western Sweden.

Findings: practices that are demonstrably useful and should be encouraged were mostly documented, except for physical assessments, such as pulse and temperature and emotional aspects. Vaginal examinations were carried out more often than recommended, and fetal heart rates were seldom monitored intermittently. Practices classified as harmful, practices with insufficient evidence and practices frequently used inappropriately, were used to a large extent. There were high rates of interventions regardless of the women's risk level. The interventions were carried out without a rational documented indication. According to the documentation, only two-thirds of the women were in active labour on admission to the labour ward.

Conclusion and implications for practice: the recommendations from WHO were only partly adhered to. The instrument is considered useful for systematic audit of documented intrapartal care, and may help to identify areas in need of improvement. Improvements suggested by this study were as follows: inclusion of emotional aspects in the documentation, differentiation in cardiotocographic (CTG) surveillance for women at low and high risk, documentation of explicit indications for interventions and guidelines for admission to the maternity unit.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 22, no 3, 207-217 p.
Keyword [en]
assessment, documentation, intrapartal care, WHO
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-81576DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2005.05.006ISI: 000240483700003PubMedID: 16368171OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-81576DiVA: diva2:109491
Available from: 2007-02-20 Created: 2007-02-20 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Axelsson, Ove

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Axelsson, Ove
By organisation
Department of Women's and Children's Health
In the same journal
Midwifery
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 502 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf