uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
We adapt ... but is it good or bad?: Locating the political ecology and social-ecological systems debate in reindeer herding in the Swedish Sub-Arctic
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala Centre for Sustainable Development, CSD Uppsala.
Sodertorn Univ, Sch Nat Sci Technol & Environm Studies, Huddinge, Sweden..
Stockholm Univ, Dept Educ, Stockholm, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Journal of political ecology, ISSN 1073-0451, E-ISSN 1073-0451, Vol. 24, 667-691 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Reindeer herding (RDH) is a livelihood strategy deeply connected to Sami cultural tradition. This article explores the implications of two theoretical and methodological approaches for grasping complex socioenvironmental relationships of RDH in Subarctic Sweden. Based on joint fieldwork, two teams -one that aligns itself with political ecology (PE) and the other with social-ecological systems (SES)-compared PE and SES approaches of understanding RDH. Our purpose was twofold: 1) to describe the situation of Sami RDH through the lenses of PE and SES, exploring how the two approaches interpret the same empirical data; 2) to present an analytical comparison of the ontological and epistemological assumptions of this work, also inferring different courses of action to instigate change for the sustainability of RDH. Key informants from four sameby in the Kiruna region expressed strong support for the continuation of RDH as a cultural andeconomic practice. Concerns about the current situation raised by Sami representatives centered on the cumulative negative impacts on RDH from mining, forestry and tourism. PE and SES researchers offered dissimilar interpretations of the key aspects of the RDH socio-economic situation, namely: the nature and scale of RDH systems; the ubiquitous role of conflict; and conceptualizations of responses to changing socioenvironmental conditions. Due to these disparities, PE and SES analyses have radically divergent sociopolitical implications for what ought to be done to redress the current RDH situation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
UNIV ARIZONA LIBRARIES , 2017. Vol. 24, 667-691 p.
Keyword [en]
Reindeer herding, political ecology, social-ecological systems, resilience, interdisciplinary, ontological assumptions, conflicts/consensus, adaptation
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-323679ISI: 000400392200042OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-323679DiVA: diva2:1111870
Available from: 2017-06-19 Created: 2017-06-19 Last updated: 2017-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Volume 24 (2017) Articles

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gallardo Fernández, Gloria L.
By organisation
Uppsala Centre for Sustainable Development, CSD Uppsala
In the same journal
Journal of political ecology
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf