Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler for maintenance and relief in mild-to-moderate asthma: a randomized, double-blind trial
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm , Centrum för klinisk forskning i D län (CKFD).
Show others and affiliations
2006 (English)In: Chest, ISSN 0012-3692, E-ISSN 1931-3543, Vol. 129, no 2, p. 246-256Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Study objective: To compare a novel asthma management strategy—budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler for both maintenance therapy and symptom relief—with a higher dose of budesonide plus as-needed terbutaline.

Methods: This was a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma (n = 697; mean age, 38 years [range, 11 to 79 years]; mean baseline FEV1, 75% of predicted; mean inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] dosage, 348 μg/d). Following a 2-week run-in period, all patients received two blinded, dry powder inhalers, one containing maintenance medication and one containing medication to be used as needed for the relief of symptoms. Patients were randomized to receive either budesonide/formoterol (80 μg/4.5 μg, two inhalations qd) for maintenance plus additional inhalations as needed for symptom relief, or budesonide (160 μg, two inhalations qd) for maintenance medication plus terbutaline (0.4 mg) as needed. The primary efficacy variable was morning peak expiratory flow (PEF).

Results: Patients receiving budesonide/formoterol showed greater improvements in morning PEF than patients receiving budesonide (increases of 34.5 L/min vs 9.5 L/min, respectively; p < 0.001). The risk of having a severe exacerbation (hospitalization/emergency department [ED] treatment, oral steroids for asthma, or a ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in morning PEF on 2 consecutive days) was 54% lower with budesonide/formoterol vs budesonide (p = 0.0011). Budesonide/formoterol patients experienced 90% fewer hospitalizations/ED treatments due to asthma than budesonide patients (1 vs 10, respectively; p = 0.026). The increased efficacy with budesonide/formoterol was achieved with less ICS than was used in the budesonide group (mean dose, 240 μg/d vs 320 μg/d, respectively) and with 77% fewer oral steroid treatment days vs budesonide (114 days vs 498 days, respectively). Both treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusions: Budesonide/formoterol for both maintenance and relief improves asthma control with a lower steroid load compared with a higher dose of budesonide plus terbutaline.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 129, no 2, p. 246-256
Keywords [en]
Administration; Inhalation, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged; 80 and over, Asthma/*drug therapy/physiopathology, Bronchodilator Agents/*administration & dosage, Budesonide/*administration & dosage, Child, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Drug Therapy; Combination, Ethanolamines/*administration & dosage, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate, Powders, Research Support; Non-U.S. Gov't, Terbutaline/administration & dosage
National Category
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-83622DOI: 10.1378/chest.129.2.246ISI: 000235646100009PubMedID: 16478838OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-83622DiVA, id: diva2:111530
Available from: 2006-11-07 Created: 2006-11-07 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Ställberg, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ställberg, Björn
By organisation
Family Medicine and Clinical EpidemiologyCentrum för klinisk forskning i D län (CKFD)
In the same journal
Chest
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 763 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf