uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Queer Reproduction Revisited & Why Race, Class and Citizenship Still Matters: A Response to Cristina Richie
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Gender Research. (Family and Kinship)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4174-7018
2017 (English)In: Bioethics, ISSN 0269-9702, E-ISSN 1467-8519Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In the dialogue between Timothy F. Murphy and Cristina Richie about queer bioethics and queer reproduction in this journal, significant points of the emergent and extremely important discussions on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) and queer bioethics are raised. Richie specifies correctly that queer bioethics can either complement or contradict LGBT bioethics and the queer standpoint against heteroconformity and heterofuturity is decisive here. As the field of queer bioethics is such a recent and essential part of consideration for bioethics and as it is still evolving, the objective of this intervention is to provide both an overview of important milestones of queer bioethics and to highlight that queer bioethics is not mono-logic and monolithic. To exemplify queer bioethic's ‘many-headed monsters’, queer reproduction is revisited and complemented by a European viewpoint. It is central to my argument and here I disagree with Richie that to be against heterofuturity does not necessarily mean to be against queer reproduction. However, I also argue that there are other reasons why queer reproduction should not be pursued at all costs. Finally, I discuss the most recent debates on race, class and citizenship, for example, queer necropolitics. These points still need to be addressed in queer bioethical agendas.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017.
Keywords [en]
Assisted Reproductive Technologies, queer, transgender, disability, race, class, citizenship
National Category
Ethics Gender Studies
Research subject
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-331150DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12416ISI: 000419596200009OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-331150DiVA, id: diva2:1148505
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 74921Available from: 2017-10-11 Created: 2017-10-11 Last updated: 2018-02-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(392 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 392 kBChecksum SHA-512
27b95db3b9eeb777844bc48af92aa65b3c141a4e60ace53380f5563d41b09aedbe033983c5cf53beb0c66ceb8e78412ff3c407e47f05b4761f79150ae4b3f0fb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textFree Sharing Link

Authority records BETA

Leibetseder, Doris

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Leibetseder, Doris
By organisation
Centre for Gender Research
In the same journal
Bioethics
EthicsGender Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 34 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 102 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf