uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hurdles to peace: a level-of-analysis approach to resolving Sudan’s civil wars
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Peace and Conflict Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1282-9823
2017 (English)In: Third World Quarterly, ISSN 0143-6597, E-ISSN 1360-2241, 1-17 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Why do some peace agreements end armed conflicts whereas others do not? Previous studies have primarily focused on the relation between warring parties and the provisions included in peace agreements. Prominent mediators, however, have emphasised the importance of stakeholders at various levels for the outcome of peace agreements. To match the experience of these negotiators we apply a level-of-analysis approach to examine the contextual circumstances under which peace agreements are concluded. While prominent within the causes of war literature, level-of-analysis approaches are surprisingly scant in research about conflict resolution. This article compares two Sudanese Peace Agreements: the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (2005) that ended the North–South war and led to the independence of South Sudan, and the Darfur Peace Agreement (2006) which failed to end fighting in Darfur. We find that factors at the local, national and international level explain the different outcomes of the two agreements. Hence, the two case studies illustrate the merit of employing a level-of-analysis approach to study the outcome of peace agreements. The main contribution of this article is that it presents a new theoretical framework to understand why some peace agreements terminate armed conflict whereas others do not.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. 1-17 p.
Keyword [en]
Civil war, conflict resolution, level of analysis, peace agreements, Sudan, South Sudan
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Peace and Conflict Research
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-331404DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1333417OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-331404DiVA: diva2:1149206
Projects
Conflicts, Connections, Complexities: Towards a Multi-layered Understanding of Civil War
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2015-01235
Available from: 2017-10-13 Created: 2017-10-13 Last updated: 2017-10-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01436597.2017.1333417

Authority records BETA

Brosché, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Brosché, Johan
By organisation
Department of Peace and Conflict Research
In the same journal
Third World Quarterly
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf