uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Shorter overall operative time when barbed suture is used in primary laparoscopic gastric bypass: A cohort study of 25,006 cases.
(Gastrointestinalkirurgi)
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Upper Abdominal Surgery.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Upper Abdominal Surgery.
2017 (English)In: Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, ISSN 1550-7289, E-ISSN 1878-7533, Vol. 13, no 9, 1484-1488 p., S1550-7289(17)30204-6Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Closing the remaining opening in a linear stapled anastomosis, for example in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), can be challenging.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if the novel unidirectional barbed suture (BS) is of value in LRYGB compared with polyfilament (PS) suture. We have compared operative time, early complications, and length of stay, as well as anastomotic strictures and small bowel obstruction during the first year.

SETTING: Retrospective study from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg).

METHODS: A nationwide cohort of 25,006 primary LRYGB (2211 BS and 22,795 PS) from SOReg were studied. No preoperative differences in age or gender were noted; however, BS patients had lower Body Mass Index (BMI) (41.3 versus 42.3 kg/m(2), P<.001) and less diabetes (13.7% versus 15.4%, P = .03).

RESULTS: Total operative time was 11 minutes (16%) shorter using BS compared with PS (58 versus 69 minutes, P<.001), although the mesenteric openings were more frequently closed among BS patients (94% versus 71%, P<.001). No differences were seen in early complications; anastomotic leaks or intra-abdominal abscesses were noted in 1.8% and 1.4%, respectively, P = .17. The incidence of anastomotic strictures was similar (.13% versus .17%, P = .73) as was the incidence of surgery for small bowel obstruction (1.8% versus 1.6%, P = .69).

CONCLUSIONS: The use of barbed suture for closing the remaining opening in the gastrojejunostomy shortened the operative time without increasing the risk of complications. BS is still uncommon in LRYGB, but its implementation could have significant impact on operative time.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 13, no 9, 1484-1488 p., S1550-7289(17)30204-6
Keyword [en]
Barbed suture, Complications, Gastric bypass, LRYGB, Operative time
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-333250DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.04.017PubMedID: 28732747OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-333250DiVA: diva2:1155781
Available from: 2017-11-09 Created: 2017-11-09 Last updated: 2017-11-09

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vidarsson, BjarniSundbom, MagnusEdholm, David
By organisation
Upper Abdominal Surgery
In the same journal
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 4 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf