uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A (Counter) Balancing Act: The Express Power to Order a Security on a Stay of Enforcement Pending Annulment
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2018 (English)In: ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal, ISSN 0258-3690, E-ISSN 2049-1999Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

ICSID has advised all 153 of its Members that it is beginning the process to further update the ICSID rules and regulations. One such amendment to be considered is whether the ICSID Arbitration Rules should include an express provision concerning a security for a stay of enforcement of awards. A background paper to the preparation process for these amendments explained this specific proposal as the following: ‘Similar to security for costs, parties might be assisted by an express rule addressing when an ad hoc committee could order security on a stay of enforcement of awards.’2

 By reviewing the ICSID jurisprudence concerning the stays of enforcement pending annulment, including specific jurisprudence focusing on orders of security, this article will endeavour to determine whether parties would be assisted by an express rule and, if so, what that express rule should be. This article will start with a short introduction to continued stays of enforcement (Section I), followed by a review of the trends in ICSID jurisprudence on stays of enforcement (Section II). For the sake of comparison, this article will also briefly discuss trends for stays of enforcement in the non-ICSID context (Section III). This article will then review the approaches of ad hoc committees exercising their discretion to issue a stay of enforcement subject to a condition or provision of security (Section IV). Finally, the article will analyse the ‘assistance’ that an express rule for ordering a security on a stay of enforcement could provide (Section V).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2018.
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-342795DOI: 10.1093/icsidreview/six029OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-342795DiVA, id: diva2:1185190
Available from: 2018-02-23 Created: 2018-02-23 Last updated: 2018-03-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full texthttps://academic.oup.com/icsidreview/advance-article/doi/10.1093/icsidreview/six029/4903004?guestAccessKey=f7dda4ca-70b7-44b9-bf6d-a1d0cc4e49fa

Authority records BETA

Dahlquist Cullborg, Joel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dahlquist Cullborg, Joel
By organisation
Department of Law
In the same journal
ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf