uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Recommended standards for conducting and reporting ethnopharmacological field studies
Univ Zurich, Inst Systemat & Evolutionary Bot, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Biology, Department of Organismal Biology, Systematic Biology. Univ Oslo, Nat Hist Museum, N-0318 Oslo, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1985-7859
Univ Kent, Sch Anthropol & Conservat, Ctr Biocultural Div, Canterbury CT2 7NR, Kent, England..
Naturalis Biodivers Ctr, Darwinweg 2, NL-2333 CR Leiden, Netherlands.;Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen, Netherlands..
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Journal of Ethnopharmacology, ISSN 0378-8741, E-ISSN 1872-7573, Vol. 210, p. 125-132Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Ethnopharmacological relevance: What are the minimum methodological and conceptual requirements for an ethnopharmacological field study? How can the results of ethnopharmacological field studies be reported so that researchers with different backgrounds can draw on the results and develop new research questions and projects? And how should these field data be presented to get accepted in a scientific journal such as the Journal of Ethnopharmacology? The objective of this commentary is to create a reference that covers the basic standards necessary during planning, conducting and reporting of field research.

Materials and methods: We focus on conducting and reporting ethnopharmacological field studies on medicinal plants or materia medico and associated knowledge of a specific people or region. The article highlights the most frequent problems and pitfalls, and draws on published literature, fieldwork experience, and extensive insights from peer-review of field studies.

Results: Research needs to be ethical and legal, and follow local and national regulations. Primary ethnopharmacological field data need to be collected and presented in a transparent and comprehensible way. In short this includes: 1) Relevant and concise research questions, 2) Thorough literature study encompassing all available information on the study site from different disciplines, 3) Appropriate methods to answer the research questions, 4) Proper plant use documentation, unambiguously linked to voucher specimens, and 5) Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the collected data, the latter relying on use-reports as basic units.

Conclusion: Although not exhaustive, we provide an overview of the necessary main issues to consider for field research and data reporting including a list of minimal standards and recommendations for best practices. For methodological details and how to correctly apply specific methods, we refer to further reading of suggested textbooks and methods manuals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 210, p. 125-132
Keywords [en]
Methods, Ethnobotany, Ethnopharmacology, Standards, Field research, Traditional medicine
National Category
Ethnology Pharmacology and Toxicology Botany
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-343887DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.08.018ISI: 000416879000013PubMedID: 28834697OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-343887DiVA, id: diva2:1187713
Available from: 2018-03-05 Created: 2018-03-05 Last updated: 2018-03-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

de Boer, Hugo J.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
de Boer, Hugo J.
By organisation
Systematic Biology
In the same journal
Journal of Ethnopharmacology
EthnologyPharmacology and ToxicologyBotany

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf