uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term studies (five or more years) assessing maxillary sinus floor augmentation
Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 18-22 Hobrovej, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark..
Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 18-22 Hobrovej, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, Centre for Research and Development, Gävleborg. Publ Hlth Serv, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Gavle, Sweden..
Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Surg Sci, BIOMATCELL VINN Excellence Ctr,Dept Biomat, Gothenburg, Sweden.;NU Hospital Org, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Trollhattan, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, ISSN 0901-5027, E-ISSN 1399-0020, Vol. 47, no 1, p. 103-116Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The objective was to test the hypothesis of no difference in long-term (>= 5 years) implant treatment outcomes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with autogenous bone graft compared to a mixture of autogenous bone graft and bone substitutes or bone substitutes alone. A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted. Human studies published in English between January 1, 1990 and October 1, 2016 were included. Nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The survival of suprastructures has never been compared within the same study. The 5-year implant survival after MSFA with autogenous bone graft was 97%, compared to 95% for Bio-Oss; the reduction in vertical height of the augmented sinus was equivalent with the two treatment modalities. Non comparative studies demonstrated high survival rates for suprastructures and implants regardless of the grafting material used. Meta-analysis revealed an overall estimated patient-based implant survival of 95% (confidence interval 0.92-0.96). High implant stability quotient values, high patient satisfaction, and limited peri-implant marginal bone loss were revealed in non-comparative studies. No long-term randomized controlled trial comparing the different treatment modalities was identified. Hence, the conclusions drawn from the results of this systematic review should be interpreted with caution.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2018. Vol. 47, no 1, p. 103-116
Keywords [en]
alveolar ridge augmentation, dental implants, oral surgical procedures, review, sinus floor augmentation
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-350120DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.001ISI: 000423001600016PubMedID: 28545806OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-350120DiVA, id: diva2:1204276
Available from: 2018-05-07 Created: 2018-05-07 Last updated: 2018-05-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Hallman, MatsMordenfeld, Arne

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hallman, MatsMordenfeld, Arne
By organisation
Centre for Research and Development, Gävleborg
In the same journal
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf