uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Epistemic modality and evidentiality in Romance: the Reportive Conditional: Semantics and variation
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Languages, Department of Modern Languages, Romance Languages.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6540-7622
2018 (English)In: Epistemic Modalities and Evidentiality in Cross-Linguistic Perspective / [ed] Zlatka Guentchéva, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2018, 1, p. 69-102Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In this article we study the Reportive Conditional (RC) in Romance, in French (1), Italian (2) and Spanish (3), using both unidirectional translation corpora and comparative corpora:

(1) Kadhafi seraitRC malade ‘Gaddafi is reportedly ill’,

(2) Gheddafi sarebbeRC malato,

(3) Kadafi estariaRC enfermo.

The Reportive Conditional (RC) is analysed as a bicategorial epistemic marker denoting reportive evidentiality and zero modalization (the refusal to epistemically endorse the mediated content of the utterance).

The arguments for this analysis are in large measure derived from the RC’s discourse properties and functions as shown outside its mediation domain (the sequence conveying the mediated cognitive content), as well as outside and inside discourse frames opened by prepositional phrases of the type Selon X (‘According to X’). It is shown that the speaker’s epistemic attitude is variable (dubitative and non-dubitative), whereas the modal orientation inherent in the epistemic RC is invariably positive (towards ‘true’). It is further shown that this verb form is exploited rhetorically to establish ascending gradations: the epistemic distancing intensifies from a first discourse frame, in the Indicative, to a second one, in the RC.

From a comparative point of view and even though the sets of epistemic uses of the Conditional are not identical in the different Romance languages, the Reportive Conditional seems to be semantically fairly equivalent in these languages, whereas the normative attitude towards the Reportive Conditional varies considerably from one language to the other, which entails differences in frequency among the Romance languages and among discourse genres within these languages. More specifically, it is shown that diaphasic (“situational”), diatopic (“geographic”) and diachronic aspects of variation are interdependent in the case of the Spanish RC.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2018, 1. p. 69-102
Keyword [en]
evidentiality, hearsay, epistemic modality, reported speech, linguistic variation, Romance languages, French, Italian, Spanish
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Research subject
Romance Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-353048DOI: 10.1515/9783110572261-004ISBN: 978-3-11-052419-2 (print)ISBN: 978-3-11-057226-1 (electronic)ISBN: 978-3-11-056988-9 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-353048DiVA, id: diva2:1215844
Note

Artikel-doi:

 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110572261-004

Available from: 2018-06-09 Created: 2018-06-09 Last updated: 2018-06-09

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kronning, Hans
By organisation
Romance Languages
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf