uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessing adequacy of models of phyletic evolution in the fossil record
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences. Univ Oslo, Dept Biosci, CEES, Oslo, Norway.
2018 (English)In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, ISSN 2041-210X, E-ISSN 2041-210X, Vol. 9, no 12, p. 2402-2413Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Comparing relative fit of different models of evolutionary dynamics to time series of phyletic change is a common tool when interpreting the fossil record. However, a measure of relative fit is no guarantee the preferred model describes the data well. Selecting a good model is essential for robust inferences, but we are currently lacking tools to investigate if a model of phyletic evolution represents an adequate description of trait dynamics in fossil data. This study develops a general statistical framework implemented in R for assessing the adequacy of the three most commonly used models of evolution in the fossil record; stasis, directional change and random walk. The statistical framework is applied to 300 fossil time series in order to assess how often the three models represent adequate descriptions of evolutionary dynamics in the fossil record. The model that showed the best relative fit to a particular fossil time series (using AICc) passed all adequacy tests in 219 out of 300 cases (73%, directional trend = 76%, stasis = 64%, random walk = 81%). It is therefore not uncommon that the best model according to AICc does not adequately describe the trait dynamics in a fossil time series. Statistical tests of model adequacy ease evaluation of whether a particular model is a good descriptor of phyletic evolution and can assist in making meaningful inferences of model parameters (e.g., as rates of evolution) and interpretations of evolution in the fossil record.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2018. Vol. 9, no 12, p. 2402-2413
Keywords [en]
adePEM, fossil record, paleoTS, random walk, stasis, time series, trend
National Category
Evolutionary Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-373007DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13083ISI: 000453591800010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-373007DiVA, id: diva2:1278068
Funder
The Research Council of Norway, 249961Available from: 2019-01-11 Created: 2019-01-11 Last updated: 2019-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Department of Earth Sciences
In the same journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Evolutionary Biology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 10 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf