uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Vascular training and endovascular practice in Europe
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, ISSN 1078-5884, Vol. 37, no 1, 109-15 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the status of vascular surgery (VS) training paradigms on the actual practice of endovascular therapy among the European countries. METHODS: An email-based survey concerning vascular surgery training models and endovascular practices of different clinical specialties was distributed to a VS educator within 14 European countries. European Vascular and Endovascular Monitor (EVEM) data also were processed to correlate endovascular practice with training models. RESULTS: Fourteen questionnaires were gathered. Vascular training in Europe appears in 3 models: 1. Mono-specialty (independence): 7 countries, 2. Subspecialty: 5 countries, 3. An existing specialty within general surgery: 2 countries. Independent compared to non-independent certification shortens overall training length (5.9 vs 7.9 years, p=0.006), while increasing overall training devoted specifically to VS (3.9 vs 2.7 years, p=0.008). Among countries with independent certification an average of 76% of aortic and 50% of peripheral endovascular procedures are performed by vascular surgeons, while the corresponding values, for countries with a non-independent certification, are 69% and 36% respectively. Countries with independent vascular certification, despite their lower average endovascular index (procedures per 100,000 population), reported a higher growth rate of aortic endovascular procedures (VS independent 132% vs VS non-independent 87%), within a four-year period (2003-2007). Peripheral endovascular procedures, though, have similar growth rates in both country groups (VS independent 62% vs VS non-independent 60%). CONCLUSIONS: In European countries with VS as an independent specialty, vascular surgeons have a shorter total training period but spend more time in VS training, although they may not undertake a greater proportion of the endovascular procedures their countries appear to have adopted endovascular technologies more rapidly compared to the ones with non-independent VS curricula. Whether such differences influence patient outcomes requires investigation in future studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 37, no 1, 109-15 p.
Keyword [en]
Vascular training, Vascular certification, Endovascular, Europe
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-87432DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.09.015PubMedID: 18990591OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-87432DiVA: diva2:131712
Available from: 2008-12-18 Created: 2008-12-18 Last updated: 2009-03-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Vascular Surgery
In the same journal
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 190 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link